[just fixing title so that nashorn-dev archive's list is readable in future]
-Sundar On 10/17/2016 9:47 PM, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote: > In fact there's https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157723, which was > filed by you and waiting for me. I actually dug it up earlier today. The fix > you suggested seems to be working, so it looks like we should do this. > > Hannes > > >> Am 17.10.2016 um 17:27 schrieb Attila Szegedi <szege...@gmail.com>: >> >>> On 17 Oct 2016, at 03:21, Hannes Wallnöfer <hannes.wallnoe...@oracle.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Esben, >>> >>> >>>> Am 17.10.2016 um 09:11 schrieb Esben Andreasen <es...@esbena.dk>: >>>> >>>> A. >>>> Where can I read about such non-ECMA-standard features in Nashorn? >>>> >>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Nashorn/Nashorn+extensions >>> >>> I don’t think the string methods from java.lang.String are contained in >>> that page because, as Attila said, it is a side effect of using >>> java.lang.String as JS string representation and transparently exposing >>> Java methods to scripts. >> I was thinking that maybe we shoud switch off Java methods on Nashorn >> primitives with --no-java. A quick test shows we don’t do that now. >> >> Attila.
