------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/1dTolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

U.S. at odds over world tribunal
BY LETTA TAYLER
LATIN AMERICA CORRESPONDENT
http://www.nynewsday.com/news/nationworld/world/ny-woicc16,0,5542089.story?coll=ny-world-big-pix

ROSEAU, Dominica -- Translucent and beguiling, the Caribbean waters that surround this 
speck of a tropical island define tranquillity. And therein lies the problem.

Gone are the Dominican Coast Guard vessels that used to prowl the coast, stalking drug 
traffickers who whiz toward the United States in boats filled with cocaine. They've 
been grounded, victims of a spat over an international war-crimes court that has 
prompted Washington to withhold millions of dollars in aid over the past year from 
allies around the globe.

"The drug dealers feel they have free passage because we're not out patrolling," said 
Sgt. Eric Elizee, the Coast Guard commander, as he stared at his idled boats. With no 
money to fuel and repair the fleet, he said, "we just sit here and pray."

Dominica is not alone. A Bush administration policy of suspending military aid to 
nations that won't promise to shield Americans from the war-crimes tribunal, called 
the International Criminal Court, is reducing or canceling dozens of programs that 
further U.S. interests abroad, Newsday has found.

Among numerous examples, Croatia lost $5.8 million that was earmarked primarily for 
training troops -- a process that would aid its entry into the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization.

Tanzania lost $450,000 to bolster security, even though it was the site of a deadly 
U.S. Embassy bombing in 1998. Elsewhere in Africa, Washington withheld more than $7 
million from South Africa, $500,000 from Benin and $250,000 from Mali -- funds 
earmarked for "strengthening regional stability" and decreasing reliance on U.S. 
peacekeepers.

Ecuador, a key ally in the U.S. war on drugs, lost $15.7 million, much of it for 
military equipment that could help detect narco-traffickers on its border with 
Colombia, the primary source of cocaine entering the United States.

The war-crimes court, which opened two years ago in The Hague, Netherlands, with 
strong support from the United Nations, is the first permanent international body to 
try individuals for war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. It aims to 
prosecute cases when nations can't or won't do so themselves.

U.S. officials say Americans must be shielded from the court because rogue nations 
could use it to launch politically motivated lawsuits against the United States.

"Unaccountable judges, prosecutors, could pull our troops, our diplomats up for 
trial," President George W. Bush said of the court during his first debate with 
Democratic contender John Kerry, who supports the tribunal.

Returning unprompted to the topic in his second debate with Kerry, Bush acknowledged 
Washington was at odds with some nations over the court, but insisted: "Sometimes in 
this world you make unpopular decisions because you think they're right." Kerry did 
not respond on either occasion.

Safeguards in place

Critics acknowledge the United States may be unfairly targeted because of its 
superpower status, but insist the court has built in safeguards to prevent 
prosecution. Rather than helping U.S. citizens, they say, the funding freezes are 
further tarnishing Washington's image among allies already opposed to U.S. policies, 
including the invasion of Iraq.

"The United States is resorting to strong-arm tactics that have created a great deal 
of ill will while harming its own wars on drugs and terrorism," said Richard Dicker, 
director for international justice at New York-based Human Rights Watch.

Washington's campaign is forcing nations that have joined the court to apply a double 
standard of international justice, critics contend: immunity for U.S. citizens but 
prosecution for everyone else.

"The principal superpower, which should guide other nations toward the rule of law, is 
turning into a bully of the world," said Arthur Robinson, former president of Trinidad 
and Tobago and architect of the International Criminal Court.

Trinidad and Tobago lost $450,000 in funding for its Coast Guard, most of it in 
training, for not signing a pact called an Article 98 that pledges to not surrender 
U.S. nationals to the court if they are suspected of committing crimes on foreign 
soil. It is among nearly two dozen nations whose military aid remains halted for not 
signing an Article 98 with the United States, the only government to seek such 
non-surrender pacts.

U.S. State Department officials insist the funding suspensions aren't harming national 
interests because the aid has been transferred to equally valuable programs elsewhere.

For governments that have "stepped up to the plate" by signing non-surrender pacts, 
"it's been a positive for the relationship," said Patricia McNerney, senior adviser to 
John Bolton, the U.S. undersecretary of state for international security. In many 
instances, she added, "more assistance has come their way."

That hasn't been the case in Dominica, which in May reluctantly signed a non-surrender 
accord after as many as 15 Dominica citizens drowned in a capsized boat that the Coast 
Guard couldn't rescue because it had no cash for fuel. It is one of several nations 
that created an uproar domestically by signing an Article 98 because it needed the 
money.

As soon as Dominica signed, Bush authorized the release of the $400,000 in suspended 
aid -- almost the entire Dominican Coast Guard budget and a fortune to this country of 
70,000 people. But Dominica has yet to receive a penny.

"Usually when you have a bear breathing down your neck, the best way to make the bear 
go away is to yield, but so far that hasn't worked," said Crispin Gregoire, Dominica's 
ambassador to the United Nations. "We are trying to help the United States fight the 
war on drugs, and this is what we get."

Mary Ellen Gilroy, deputy chief of mission for the Barbados-based U.S. Embassy for the 
Eastern Caribbean, blamed the delay on bureaucracy. Dominica "will get its money," she 
promised, but acknowledged: "I don't know when."

Washington's campaign against the court has shown mixed results. Though more than 90 
governments have signed Article 98s, only about one-fourth of the accords have been 
deemed legally binding in the nations that penned them. None of the court's most 
prominent members, including all the European Union nations, has signed non-surrender 
pacts.

Underscoring continued international opposition to the U.S. policy, the UN Security 
Council refused in June to exempt U.S. peacekeepers from prosecution by the tribunal 
as it had for two previous years. That refusal was motivated in part by the scandal 
over U.S. troops' abuse of Iraqis detained at Abu Ghraib prison. In retaliation, the 
Pentagon withdrew nine U.S. peacekeepers from nations that haven't signed Article 98s.

The campaign against the court also is being fought in the U.S. Congress. In July, the 
House of Representatives approved a measure that would extend the ban on military aid 
to virtually all forms of foreign assistance when nations don't sign Article 98s. It 
appears unlikely, however, that the bill will become law this session.

Exemptions and waivers

Congress passed a law two years ago authorizing the aid suspensions, but exempted NATO 
members and a handful of other allies. The law allows Bush to issue additional waivers 
to nations deemed vital to national interests. But few have been forthcoming, and even 
some nations that received them were threatened with funding cuts.

Jordan, one of the few U.S. allies in the Middle East, had a waiver, but Washington 
still threatened to withhold $100 million in aid for training Iraqi policemen -- who 
are desperately needed to replace U.S. troops in Iraq -- if it didn't sign an Article 
98.

Though U.S. officials capitulated after Jordan refused to sign, "It leaves a very sour 
taste, particularly because countries who support the International Criminal Court are 
traditional allies of the United States," one foreign diplomat close to the issue said.

Those allies include Croatia, where U.S. officials are withholding military aid even 
as they have asked the Croatian government to send troops to Iraq and expand its 
military presence in Afghanistan. Croatia already is facing fire at home for acceding 
to a request from Washington and other governments to send Croatians to a separate 
international court judging war crimes in the former Yugoslavia.

"It would be very difficult to explain to the Croatian public how we can have one way 
of treating our own citizens and another for citizens of another country," Croatian 
President Stjepan Mesic said last year.

Another ally that lost out is St. Vincent and the Grenadines, a West Indies 
archipelago near Dominica, which diverted funds from social assistance programs to 
keep its Coast Guard afloat after losing $300,000 in U.S. aid. Consequently, the 
government couldn't afford to distribute enough galvanized steel and lumber to rebuild 
all 400 homes leveled last month by Hurricane Ivan, officials there said.

"It's been quite a strain on us," said Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves. "But because we 
need to keep our tourists safe, I have to protect my borders."

Colombia sides with U.S.

Colombia's president Alvaro Uribe, arguably the staunchest U.S. ally in Latin America, 
signed an Article 98 last year to avoid losing $130 million for training, helicopters 
and other equipment.

Though government officials deny kowtowing, opposition leaders insist Uribe buckled 
because of fear Washington would cut other vital aid such as trade deals that allow 
Colombia to sell half its exports to the United States.

"We were made to understand indirectly that it wasn't only the military aid at risk, 
but also our close bilateral relations with the United States, which are critical to 
us," said Colombian opposition Sen. Jimmy Chamorra, who unsuccessfully sought to have 
the Article 98 rescinded on grounds it wasn't ratified by the country's legislature.

In some nations, relations are so frayed over the non-surrender agreements that 
foreign officials accuse Washington of canceling programs beyond those required by 
law, as added punishment.

In Ecuador, Jorge Gross, a chief defense ministry aide, suspects his nation's refusal 
to sign an Article 98 -- a decision that cost them counter-narcotics equipment 
including night-vision goggles, radars and bulletproof vests -- prompted the Pentagon 
to cancel a program in which U.S. military would have built nine schools and 
surgically repaired birth defects on impoverished children. A U.S. Defense Department 
spokesman said the program was scrapped because Ecuador refused to let U.S. service 
members enter the country with their weapons.

In Dominica, some people view the funding freeze as part of a broader pattern. Many 
mention a case Washington won before the World Trade Organization seven years ago that 
blocked the former British colony from selling bananas at preferential prices to the 
European Union. That ruling helped U.S. banana companies but practically killed the 
banana industry in Dominica, making the country more desperate for cash.

"Maybe if the United States had let us sell our bananas, we wouldn't need their money 
to run the Coast Guard," suggested octogenarian Martin John, as he sat on a stoop in 
this tiny capital city, sporting a New York Yankees cap. "We've always been friends to 
the United States. Maybe we shouldn't be so friendly."

Copyright � 2004, Newsday, Inc.


=========+=========
FEEDBACK?
http://nativenewsonline.org/Guestbook/guestbook.cgi
GIVE FOOD: THE HUNGERSITE
http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reprinted under the Fair Use http://nativenewsonline.org/fairuse.htm
=========+=========
Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
Native News Online 
a Service of Barefoot Connection

FREE LEONARD PELTIER!! "YOU ~ARE~ THE MESSAGE"


 

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nat-International/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to