------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/1dTolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

  The Dead Walk
     By Nicholas D. Kristof
     The New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/16/opinion/16kristof.html
     Saturday 16 October 2004

     Along the Chad-Sudan Border - In June I wrote several columns about Magboula 
Muhammad Khattar, a young Sudanese woman whose parents and husband had been murdered 
in Darfur and who had escaped by night to the Chad border.

     She was living under a tree there. One of her sons was then so sick, probably 
from contaminated water - 20,000 people were living out in the open without a single 
toilet - that he seemed likely to die.

     On returning this month, I searched again for Ms. Khattar.

     Now, each time I write about the genocide in Darfur, I hear from readers who say 
something like: "It's terrible to hear the stories, but face reality - Africans are 
always slaughtering each other." Or: "It's none of our business, and anyway we don't 
have extra troops to send." Or: "There's nothing we can do."

     If that were true, then Ms. Khattar would now be dead.

     So would the woman I'd met huddled under the very next tree, Zahra Abdel Karim, 
whose husband and two young sons had been slaughtered by the Janjaweed militia. She 
had been gang-raped along with her two sisters, who were then killed. Ms. Zahra was 
slashed with a sword and left to hobble away, naked and bleeding - but determined to 
survive so she could stagger across the desert to Chad and save her remaining child.

     Yet I just had a wonderful reunion here with Ms. Khattar and Ms. Zahra, who are 
now fast friends. They and the other 200,000 Darfur refugees in Chad are living in 
camps, with tents for shelter, purified water, medical care and food distributions. 
Even within Darfur itself, the United Nations World Food Program managed to get food 
to 1.3 million people last month out of the 2 million who need it.

     "It's much better here now," Ms. Khattar told me, flashing a beautiful smile as 
her son - now recovered - played with other children a few feet away.

     I also tracked down two lovely orphans, Nijah and Nibraz Ahmed, 1 and 4 years 
old, whom I had met in June after their parents were both killed by the Janjaweed. 
Their grandmother sneaked back into Darfur two weeks ago to try to find their older 
brother, so their widowed aunt is caring for them. Her situation has improved enough 
that she fed me a home-cooked breakfast on the ground outside her tent.

     The improvement for the refugees in Chad underscores how easy it is to save lives 
in a situation like this. Just a dollop of international attention led Sudan to rein 
in the Janjaweed to some degree, and to provide more humanitarian access. An 
international aid effort, overseen by the U.N., is saving countless lives by spending 
as much in a year as we spend in Iraq in a few days.

     I wish President Bush had done more to help Darfur. But he has done more than 
just about any other leader, and his legacy will be hundreds of thousands of lives 
saved in Darfur - but also tens of thousands of deaths that could have been averted if 
he had acted earlier.

     Dr. David Nabarro of the World Health Organization estimates that within Darfur 
itself, 70,000 people have perished since March 1 of hunger and illness. Add the 
deaths from violence, the deaths of refugees in Chad and the deaths before March 1, 
and my guess is that the Darfur genocide has claimed more than 100,000 lives so far - 
and the total is still rising by 5,000 to 10,000 deaths per month.

     If a halfhearted effort can save hundreds of thousands of lives - without 
dispatching troops, without a visit to the region by Mr. Bush, without providing all 
the money that is needed - then imagine what we could accomplish if we took serious 
action.

     Sudan's leaders are not Taliban-style fanatics. They are pragmatists who engaged 
in genocide because they thought it was the simplest way to end unrest among tribal 
peoples in Darfur. If we raise the costs of ethnic cleansing with a no-fly zone, an 
arms embargo, travel restrictions on senior officials and other targeted sanctions, 
then I think they can be persuaded to negotiate seriously toward peace.

     The history of genocide in the last century is one in which well-meaning 
Americans were distressed as Turks slaughtered Armenians, Nazis rounded up Jews and 
Gypsies, and Serbs wiped out Bosnians - but because there were no good or easy 
options, they did nothing.

     Note to Mr. Bush: This time, we can still redeem ourselves - but time is running 
out, at the rate of 200 lives a day.

  


=========+=========
FEEDBACK?
http://nativenewsonline.org/Guestbook/guestbook.cgi
GIVE FOOD: THE HUNGERSITE
http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reprinted under the Fair Use http://nativenewsonline.org/fairuse.htm
=========+=========
Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
Native News Online 
a Service of Barefoot Connection

FREE LEONARD PELTIER!! "YOU ~ARE~ THE MESSAGE"


 

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nat-International/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to