On Jan 24, 2009, at 19:16, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
[...] I think we'll see IPv6 NAT deployment in the meantime (and perhaps in parallel).
p1. it remains to be seen whether IPv6 NAT deployments will be successful at trading off transparency and interoperability for the benefits we are only *supposing* they will provide.
p2. by itself, the deployment of IPv6 NAT is not a reason for IETF to *standardize* it. we are deploying IPv6 Simple Security today, and no one is arguing that it should be standardized.
-- james woodyatt <[email protected]> member of technical staff, communications engineering _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
