RJ Atkinson wrote: > > Keith, > > You were present for 6AI. You heard the general agreement > in the room to the terminology outlined in my previous note. > You objected to many things said during the 6AI BOF, but > not to the terminology that I outlined in my previous note > to this list. > > Please don't try to re-negotiate terminology now, and > please don't undertake a DOS attack on this mailing list > by persuing some different approach. >
Ran, I am trying to make a suggestion for how to move forward by suggesting that for generic terms we use terms that aren't overloaded (xyNAT rather than NATxx) and you are accusing me of malice. You owe me, and the group, an apology. Keith _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
