> Bottom line: in the real world NAT is not used without statefulness. > To make an argument against NAT that holds water you have to explain > where NAT breaks anything (in real world application) that wouldn't > otherwise be broken by the need to keep state. More bullshit. The degree to which statefulness breaks things is only a small fraction of the degree to which NAT breaks things.
_______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
