On 2010-04-30 14:11, Keith Moore wrote: > Why is there a need for such a concept as "IPv6 realm"? > > It seems to me that if we ever create IPv6 realms in the sense that > realms exist in IPv4 (i.e. if we make IPv6 addresses ambiguous), we've > irrevocably broken IPv6.
I agree. To be clear, the NAT66 draft does *not* do this. There is of course a very real possibility of regions of IPv6 address space which are not mutually reachable, due to firewalls or even more aggressive forms of walled garden. But that doesn't make them realms in the RSIP sense (if you don't know about RSIP, see RFC 3102...3105). Brian _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
