Even if one accepts the need for v6-v6 NAT (I do not) that's still not a
justification for IPv6 addressing realms.
> Look at the "cc" line of this email.
>
> On Apr 30, 2010, at 3:11 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
>
>> Why is there a need for such a concept as "IPv6 realm"?
>>
>> It seems to me that if we ever create IPv6 realms in the sense that realms 
>> exist in IPv4 (i.e. if we make IPv6 addresses ambiguous), we've irrevocably 
>> broken IPv6.
>>
>> And if we end up creating a subtly different concept in IPv6 - something 
>> like realms without the potential for address assignment conflicts - it will 
>> be confusing to call such things realms.
>>
>> But I really think the right thing to do is to make explicit that there is 
>> only one "realm" for the entire IPv6 address space.
>>
>> Keith
>>> We got a definition for "IPv4 realm", based on RFC 2663 (but also RFC 3103).
>>> Both RFC's are IPv4 oriented, not providing an explicit definition  for an 
>>> "IPv6 realm".
>>>  
>>> This question might be related to NAT66, because the IPv4 realm concept is 
>>> originating from NAT44.
>>>  
>>> Does anyone know a correspondent definition/reference for IPv6 realm?
>>>  
>>> If not, I'd like to offer an initial proposal for discussion, - a common 
>>> realm term for IPv4 and IPv6: 
>>>
>>> (IPv4 or IPv6 address) realm: is defined as a set of addresses, which share 
>>> all a common prefix, that are mutually reachable (thus, within a single IP 
>>> routing domain).
>>>  
>>> Note: "IPv6 realm" definition based on the GLOBAL UNICAST ADDRESS format (ยง 
>>> 2.5.4/RFC 4291) because this is a hierarchical format using a "global 
>>> routing prefix", which is assigned to a "site" (i.e. sth like a REALM).
>>> Comments would be appreciated,
>>> Albrecht
>>> _____
>>> RFC 2663 IP Network Address Translator (NAT) Terminology and Considerations
>>> 2.1. Address realm or realm
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    An address realm is a network domain in which the network addresses
>>>    are uniquely assigned to entities such that datagrams can be routed
>>>    to them. Routing protocols used within the network domain are
>>>    responsible for finding routes to entities given their network
>>>    addresses. Note that this document is limited to describing NAT in
>>>    IPv4 environment and does not address the use of NAT in other types
>>>    of environment. (e.g. IPv6 environments)
>>>
>>>     
>>> RFC 3103 Realm Specific IP: Protocol Specification
>>> 3.  Terminology
>>>    Private Realm
>>>
>>>       A routing realm that uses private IP addresses from the ranges
>>>       (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) specified in
>>>       [
>>> RFC1918
>>> ], or addresses that are non-routable from the Internet.
>>>
>>>    Public Realm
>>>
>>>       A routing realm with unique network addresses assigned by the
>>>       Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) or an equivalent address
>>>       registry.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nat66 mailing list
>>>
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
>> _______________________________________________
>> nat66 mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
>
> http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF
>
> _______________________________________________
> nat66 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66

Reply via email to