Thus wrote Roger Marquis ([email protected]):
> "S.P.Zeidler" wrote:
> >Remains the question why you'd bother with NAT66? What advantage does it
> >deliver over using the public addresses directly?
>
> This question has been answered many times in many forums. Please refer
> to arin-ppml and/or nanog for reasons why nat66, or some other form of
> nat, is prerequisite to IPv6 uptake. The nat66 list is really not the
> proper forum for this particular question.
You are citing me out of context.
Why would you use NAT66 in a way where you renumber the internal network
each time the (in that model, by necessity, singular) external prefix
changes? i.e. when it gives you neither address independence nor delayed
routing decision advantages? While still being stateless, so not serving
as cheap connection diode either?
Does -that- have multiple answers on NANOG etc?
regards,
spz
--
[email protected] (S.P.Zeidler)
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
