Le 21 oct. 2010 à 21:43, Roger Marquis a écrit : > "S.P.Zeidler" wrote: >> Remains the question why you'd bother with NAT66? What advantage does it >> deliver over using the public addresses directly? > > This question has been answered many times in many forums. Please refer > to arin-ppml and/or nanog for reasons why nat66, or some other form of > nat, is prerequisite to IPv6 uptake.
IPv6 has been extensively deployed by Free in France since december 2007, and later by SoftBank in Japan, without NAT66. This is enough, in my understanding, to contradict that NAT66 is a "prerequisite to IPv6 uptake". Besides, breaking e2e address transparency is the worse that can happen to discourage people to deploy and use IPv6. > The nat66 list is really not the > proper forum for this particular question. This is then not the proper forum either to say that NAT66 is a prerequisite to IPv6 uptake. Right? RD _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
