Hi Chris,
On Oct 26, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Chris Engel wrote:
No one is arguing for a standard that NAT MUST be deployed across the entire internet. People simply want a standard by which organizations which CHOOSE to deploy it on their OWN network boundaries can expect it to behave consistently.
Some people have argued that we don't need a standard for NAT, because NATs don't have to interoperate. That argument doesn't really apply to NAT66, though, because if all NAT66 devices implement the same algorithm, it would be possible to put multiple NAT66 boxes at the borders of a site, configure them with the same prefixes, and not worry about whether inbound traffic for a given flow runs through the same NAT66 box as outbound traffic.
Margaret _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
