Chris, I would like to make sure that, despite our recent exchange of arguments, you don't count me among those who would "oppose the creation" of a NAT66 standard, or even of two (one for stateless and one for stateful).
If you find any sentence from me suggesting such an opposition, I will for sure amend it. My points are about MAKING CLEAR what these specification do achieve, and don't achieve. Regards, RD Le 26 oct. 2010 à 15:58, Chris Engel a écrit : > The point I'm trying to make is why should individuals feel compelled to > oppose the creation of a standard simply because that standard is only > applicable to a particular scope of usage cases. _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
