On Oct 27, 2010, at 1:40 PM, Fred Baker wrote: >> application implementors are grossly under-represented in IETF, which is why >> IETF hasn't reacted more vigorously and more uniformly against NATs. >> >> network equipment vendors have the most clout of any group in IETF. several >> of those guys were encouraging NAT and discouraging IETF from telling the >> truth about NAT, because they were in the business of selling NATs, and >> because NATs moved their problems into someone else's space. > > I presume, in that, that you are talking about me.
I wasn't talking about you at all, and didn't intend for it to be taken that way. Sorry if that wasn't clear. I don't recall an occasion where you personally tried to suppress information about NATs. I do recall such efforts from others in IESG and IAB who happened to work for major equipment vendors. Keith _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
