And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Source:
<A HREF="http://206.103.163.1/sunbin/stories/text/1999/mar/11/508525998.html">

http://206.103.163.1/sunbin/stories/text/1999/mar/11/508525998.html
========================================================
March 11, 1999 

Rural governments oppose nuke waste transport on public roads

BATTLE MOUNTAIN, Nev. (AP) - Two county commisions passed resolutions against
using public roads for transporting nuclear waste, and a third is scheduled to
consider a similar resolution.

The resolutions were largely symbolic protests against a House bill that would
authorize the shipment of 77,000 tons of high level nuclear waste through 43
states to the Nevada Test Site.

The bill, H.R. 45, would allow for interim storage at the test site until
Yucca Mountain, 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas (has also been reported as
60 and 80 miles..wonderful how this mountain keeps moving), is approved.
Yucca Mountain
is the only site being studied as a permanent repository for 77,000 tons of
radioactive waste now collecting at nuclear power plants across the country.
President Clinton has promised to veto bills designating Nevada as the
nationwide repository for nuclear waste.

"If this bill passes, then we're all pretty much in trouble," said Tammy
Manzini, who monitors the Yucca Mountain project for Lander County. "They
could ship the nuclear waste through all states and counties."

H.R. 45 was introduced Jan. 6. The House Resources Committee postponed action
on the resolution Feb. 23, with Rep. Jim Gibbons, R-Nev., requesting a delay.

The Eureka resolution said that "transportation of high-level nuclear waste
and spent nuclear fuel on federal, state or county highways and through the
communities ... is significantly less safe than rail transport and is
therefore unacceptable."

However, Eureka County Commission Chairman Pete Goicoechea said he would
support a rail line if it linked to rail lines at its north and south ends and
were available for public use.

The DOE has proposed a rail route from the Union Pacific tracks at Beowawe
through Crescent Valley and Austin. A link is also proposed to rail lines
south of Yucca Mountain at Yermo, Calif., near Barstow.

"If there is any transport of nuclear waste, it probably will be by rail,"
Goicoechea said.

The resolutions were passed by Eureka County officials on Friday and Lander
County on Monday. Commissioners in Nye County are scheduled to consider a
similar resolution March 16.

No final decision on whether Yucca Mountain will be used as a permanent dump
will be made until 2001, after further research and a formal environmental
impact review. Already, $2.2 billion has been spent on the project, which is
estimated to cost more than $18 billion to build and operate.

     =======================================================

--
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
          Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                     Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                  http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                             

Reply via email to