And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Toronto Star March 15, 1999
The hard sell of nuclear waste
Public's distrust of Ottawa will hinder plan
By Peter Calamai
Toronto Star Science Reporter
OTTAWA - They're probably the two hardest words in the English language
to sell - nuclear waste.
But the federal government has a master plan to market nuclear waste to
Canadians and has already started on the task.
According to the communications strategy outlined in a previously
secret cabinet document, the government plan will try to:
+ Justify continued use of Candu reactors for electricity.
+ Convince the public that the federal government is still providing
leadership on the waste issue, even though it refused to set up a crown
corporation to do the job.
+ Ensure Canadians that the new national nuclear waste agency now being
set up by Ontario Hydro and other power utilities is ``stable and
trustworthy.''
Federal officials concede privately that the marketing challenge is
formidable and past experience is hardly encouraging. Between 1987 and
1991, the nuclear industry spent $4 million on a disastrous public
relations campaign to boost public support for nuclear power to 50 per
cent.
When the campaign began, 17 per cent of Canadians said they favoured
more nuclear power plants. When the campaign ended, 14 per cent did.
``Basically, they didn't move public opinion at all after a five-year
campaign,'' says Bill Leiss, the incoming president of the Royal
Society of Canada and a recognized world expert on risk management.
Leiss says the nuclear industry, utilities like Ontario Hydro and the
federal government all carry a ``burden of public distrust''
``The federal government isn't credible as a safety regulator because
they're also promoters,'' says Leiss, a professor at the University of
Calgary. ``They're hucksters, going around the world trying to sell
Candu reactors.''
In February, Natural Resources sent two officials on a seven-city tour
to ask Canadians how the federal government should keep a tight rein on
the new waste agency that's supposed to be independent and
arm's-length.
But most ordinary Canadians never even knew the consultations were
taking place, despite local newspaper ads and announcements on the
department's web site.
``My own view is that we saw very little of the general public,'' says
Peter Brown, the official in charge of the consultations. He said most
of the presentations came from special-interest groups.
Irene Kock agrees. She's with the Nuclear Awareness Project in Durham,
one of those special interest groups.
``Canadians didn't even know they were being consulted,'' Kock says.
The main sales job is being turned over to the new national waste
agency which will be told to implement the federal communications
strategy.
But Leiss says both the nuclear industry and Ontario Hydro first have
to overcome deep-seated public distrust of any message they deliver.
``The nuclear industry earned the public's contempt over a long period
because of its obvious contempt for the public's perception of the risk
involved in nuclear power stations,'' he says.
A key part of that risk revolves around the high-level radioactive
waste left after uranium fuel burns. The waste is dangerous for at
least 10,000 years.
The country's 22 Candu reactors have already produced enough spent fuel
bundles to fill three hockey rinks to the top of the boards.
For the first 10 years, these bundles remain under heavy water inside
the reactor containment buildings. Then they are transferred to
warehouses on the site.
Yet the public may not be all that aroused by the mounting waste,
according to the cabinet briefing document prepared in October.
Citing a series of opinion surveys, the document says nuclear waste
rates low as an environmental priority with the public, possibly
because there are so many other environmental concerns.
An all-out publicity effort would help sell the new strategy, the
document promised. Key journalists, stakeholders and opinion leaders
would be briefed by officials from natural resources, Atomic Energy of
Canada Ltd., the federal environment department, the Atomic Energy
Control Board, the federal environmental assessment agency and
``possibly Ontario Hydro.''
In fact, little of that promised marketing took place.
The communications master plan did not get off to a good start and
Jeremy McNeil doubts it will ever succeed.
McNeil, a biology professor at Laval University in Quebec, is the
winner of a national medal for communicating science in an accessible
and positive fashion.
``I don't know how you can put a positive spin on nuclear waste,'' he
says.
======================================================
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you visited our new web site?
http://www.onelist.com
Onelist: Helping to create Internet communities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOEWatch List --- Subscribe online:
http://www.onelist.com/subscribe.cgi/doewatch"We have discovered the most
terrible bomb in the history of the world. It may be the fire destruction
prophesized in the Euphrates Valley Era, after Noah and his fabulous Ark.
Anyway we think we have found the way to cause the disintegration of the
atom." -Quote from Truman's diary July 25, 45 after Pottsdam and the "baby
was born"""The Doctor of the future will give No Medicine, but will
interest his patients in the care of the human frame, in diet, and in the
cause and prevention of disease."."-Attributed to Thomas Alva Edisonn"In a
time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary
act"t"-George Orwell
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
