And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

DATE: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 14:26:28
From: "Frank S. LaFountaine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

http://www.seattletimes.com/news/editorial/html98/altbolted_19990315.html=


    Copyright =A9 1999 Seattle Times Company=20
    Posted at 05:58 a.m. PST; Monday, March 15, 1999=20

    Boldt anniversary burns brightly with ESA news

   
    TOMORROW, the federal government is scheduled to announce =
long-anticipated Endangered Species Act fish listings on rivers and =
streams in Washington and Oregon.=20

    Officials in both states have been waiting for this wader to drop =
for months, and they are anxious and unsure about where it all will =
lead.=20

    Everyone is worried about federal regulations and directives with =
the potential to curtail employment and development around lakes and =
rivers in busy, growing urban areas. Changes are coming, and King, =
Pierce and Snohomish counties have been crafting rules and responses to =
try and control their own destinies.=20

    In the midst of the negotiations and consultations, all parties have =
been casting sidelong glances at the region's Indian tribes.=20

    What do they think, how will they react, what will they do?=20

    The pending ESA announcements and the quizzical looks make a fitting =
anniversary observance of the 25 years since the historic ruling by U.S. =
District Judge George Boldt.=20

    In February 1974, the judge ended a three-year trial with a 203-page =
thunderbolt of a ruling: According to long-standing treaties and the =
language of their time, tribes were entitled to half of the harvestable =
salmon running through their traditional waters.=20

    "Furthermore, Boldt made the tribes co-managers of the state's =
fisheries," wrote Times reporter Alex Tizon. "With the drop of a gavel, =
tribes transformed, in the eyes of the law, from underground poaching =
societies to at-the-table equals with the state authorities that had =
persecuted them for so long."=20

    Native Americans armed with the Boldt decision became formidable =
opponents in court. Their interests in sustainable, harvestable numbers =
of salmon had to be acknowledged and respected.=20

    Indians have been strong proponents of hatcheries to help sustain or =
revive big runs of fish, and that has put them at odds with conservation =
and sport interests that see contamination of wild stocks.=20

    The tribes, however, have long pointed to the ruinous effects on =
salmon runs from too much commercial fishing, dam-building and logging =
practices. The essence of tomorrow's ESA findings go a long way to =
proving them right.=20

    The Boldt decision realigned power relationships in the Pacific =
Northwest. A federal judge's historic, 25-year-old ruling is as fresh =
and relevant as tomorrow's headlines.=20

-
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
          Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                     Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                  http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                             

Reply via email to