And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 12:23:07 -0500
To: Recipient List Suppressed:;
From: Native Americas Journal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: WORLD COMMISSION ON DAMS TO STUDY IMPACT ON NATIVES

The following article is provided by Native Americas, published by the
Akwe:kon Press at Cornell University. For more information on how to stay
informed of emerging trends that impact Native peoples throughout the
hemisphere visit our website at http://nativeamericas.aip.cornell.edu 

WORLD COMMISSION ON DAMS TO STUDY IMPACT ON NATIVES 
By John Stevens/Native Americas 

The World Commission on Dams (WCD), whose purpose is to assess the impact
of large dam projects and develop guidelines for future development, is
reaching a critical stage in its work. A consortium prompted by
environmental group protests from an earlier World Bank survey on dam
projects, the WCD was formed in February 1998. The WCD was given two years
to form a workplan and conduct a range of studies and hearings in order to
gather information for its report. A range of results from establishing
procedures for assessing dam projects to a moratorium on megadam
development could follow. Joji Carino, an Igorot woman from the Cordillera
(Philippines), was selected as one of the twelve Commissioners. Carino is
intent on getting indigenous concerns on the table, both for WCD to focus
on and to present actual case studies, bringing the unique problems
indigenous communities face into the discussions on the future of large dams. 

Carino is effecting this effort by involving indigenous representatives and
supporters directly. In August 1998 an informal group convened at the U.N.
Working Group on Indigenous Populations. This group gave specific
suggestions for dams that needed to be studied and was to assist Carino
with outreach. Carino took the group's suggestions to the WCD, where they
were added to the list of case studies. 

Initially, fifteen dams were on the list, including the Churchill Falls
project in Canada, the Grand Coulee Dam in the U.S., the Tucurui Dam in
Brazil, and Panchat Hill/Damodar Dam in India. All of these dams had
significant impacts on indigenous communities and the environment. These
specific projects  highlight the range of problems that large dams cause to
indigenous communities and provide valuable evidence for a moratorium on
dam building, or at least a deceleration in development. This fall,
however, the Commission's research budget was cut by almost half, from $10M
to $5.6M. This forced the list of case studies to be cut to ten, dropping
the Tucurui and Churchill Falls projects to a "reserve group" list. This
strategy was planned to ensure an adequate geographical spread of dams
surveyed. The Grand Coulee Dam was ostensibly chosen over Churchill Falls
because of its history and also because it is being considered for
decommissioning. The Innu of Nitassinan, however, are lobbying to keep
Churchill Falls on the main list. They were especially incensed when, a few
weeks after the cuts were made, Hydro-Quebec donated $200,000 to the WCD
and became a member of the WCD Forum-who advise the WCD Commissioners. 

Carino believes that the Innu case for the inclusion of Churchill Falls can
be considered in one of two other ways if it is not restored to the main list. 
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
          Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                     Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                  http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                             

Reply via email to