And now:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

   Former MP calls for justice, again
http://www.canoe.ca/Columnists/worthington.html
                        By PETER WORTHINGTON
                               Toronto Sun
          As anyone knows who has ever tried, even in a minor way, to correct an 
injustice done to someone knows, it can be a long, arduous, frustrating, tortuous path 
- just ask Warren Allmand. When Indian activist Leonard Peltier was arrested in Canada 
in 1976 and extradited to the U.S. for the 1975 shooting deaths of two FBI agents 
during a range war on South Dakota's Pine Ridge reserve (near Wounded Knee), Allmand 
was first Canada's solicitor-general and then minister of Indian affairs.

He later realized the extradition was fraudulent, based on false affidavits acquired 
by the FBI from an Indian woman (Myrtle Poor Bear) who had never met Peltier, was not 
in Pine Ridge at the time, but who claimed to be his girlfriend and had watched him 
kill the agents. Peltier is in the 23rd year of two consecutive life sentences. At 
first, I felt Peltier was guilty, but over years of examining the case and evidence, 
became convinced he didn't do it.

There seems not the slightest doubt that the FBI framed him. Even today, the FBI is 
determined he'll never go free - even though they now admit they haven't a clue who 
did the actual shooting. In 1994, Allmand reviewed the case for then-justice minister 
Allan Rock, as did other justice department lawyers. Allmand released his report this 
week, after Justice Minister Anne McClellan released her own report (after contacting 
U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno) that the extradition was on the up-and-up and 
proper. Here are the highlights of Allmand's 1994 report on the extradition, with 
comments on memos submitted by Justice lawyers: * Of three Poor Bear affidavits, one 
was never included in the extradition case in which she said she hadn't witnessed the 
shooting, and had departed Pine Ridge. The FBI later acknowledged Poor Bear was 
"incompetent" and her affidavits "unbelievable." (Yet McClellan effectively still 
vouches for them.)
     
    Evidence 'fabricated' 
    * No circumstantial evidence was considered by Judge Schultz in the
   extradition and circumstantial evidence in Canada was different from that
   presented at Peltier's U.S. trial. Ballistic evidence accepted at this trial was
   later shown to be "questionable and in part, fabricated." 
    * After two other Indians were acquitted (Bob Robideau and Dino Butler)
   when their trial was shifted to Iowa, the U.S. Justice Department and FBI
   refused to let Peltier's trial take place in neutral territory and "pounded the
   community with adverse publicity regarding Peltier and the American
   Indian Movement (AIM)." 
    * A Canadian Justice lawyer went to the U.S. and co-operated with the
   FBI on the Poor Bear affidavits. Assistant FBI director Ronald Moore
   noted in a memo that it was on the Canadian lawyer's recommendation
   "that only Poor Bear's second and third affidavits were used." 
    Allmand concludes that if the Canadian lawyer didn't know about the
   excluded affidavit, "the FBI was guilty of trying to manufacture a case and
   mislead the Canadian justice system." (The lawyer himself denied any
   involvement and accused the FBI of trying to cover their butts.) 
    Three judges questioned FBI integrity. Judge Ross of the U.S. Court of
   Appeal asked "why the prosecutor's officer continued to extract more from
   her (Poor Bear) ... is beyond my understanding." 
Appeal Judge Gerald Heaney: "The FBI used improper tactics in securing Peltier's 
extradition ..." Judge R.P. Anderson of the B.C. Supreme Court: "It seems clear to me 
that the conduct of the U.S. government involved misconduct from inception." Judge 
Heaney determined that violence at Pine Ridge (over selling uranium resources that 
tribal elders opposed) was the "culmination of the federal government's refusal to 
respond to the 'legitimate grievances' raised by the Indian community."

The FBI supplied vigilante snipers with weapons and ammunition. The FBI concealed 
ballistic evidence indicating that Peltier's rifle could not have fired the shots that 
killed the agents. This "suppressed evidence" cast a strong doubt on the government's 
case.

Allmand found it's not unusual for the U.S. government to use illegal methods to 
return individuals to U.S. territory: a false extradition to get one individual 
returned from Mexico; kidnapping another in order to return a wanted man; the British 
House of Lords refused an extradition on grounds that evidence was shaky. The FBI 
blocked publication of Peter Mathiessen's book, In the Spirit of Crazy Horse for eight 
years with legal actions at a cost of some $25 million.

One oddity rarely mentioned is that the two murdered FBI agents (Ron Williams and Jack 
Coler) were supposedly entering the Jumping Bull compound to question one Jimmy Eagle 
about stolen cowboy boots. Stolen boots are an FBI concern? Give us a break. They were 
there as the vanguard for concentrated attack - giving rise to the "self-defence" 
acquittal of Butler and Robideau. In essence, Allmand in 1994 was "convinced that 
there was fraud and misconduct at both the extradition and the trial."

He recommended contacting the U.S. Attorney General and urging either a new trial or 
clemency. Failing that, he urged "an independent judicial inquiry" into circumstances 
of the extradition.
     

Reprinted under the Fair Use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html doctrine 
of international copyright law.
            &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
           Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                      Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                   http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
            &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                              

Reply via email to