On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 13:17 +0200, Jakub Steiner wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 12:30 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > Looking at the current gnome-icon-theme there are still 32x32 icons in > > the 48x48/emblems folder. Like for instance emblem-danger.png. > > Hi Alex, > Sorry for the late reply. Indeed the 48x48 still has legacy icons we > want to phase out gradually, just like */stock. But if we want to treat > emblems like regular icons, shipping them with an icon theme, I stand by > keeping the same size logic. > > As for how to do the scaling of emblems in nautilus, take a peek at how > Xfce's Thunar does it. I believe it it follows dobey's suggestion to use > a quater of the icon area. I also don't think the emblems are readable > at icon sizes of 24x24px and lower (Thunar does use them still). If you > think we need them there, we need to provide the tiny resolutions of the > emblems as scaling down to 8x8px doesn't work at all.
But the old legacy icons are there, so whatever we do about scaling we'll do some of the emblems wrong. -- nautilus-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
