On 12/11/05, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, "just-create" policy is fine, clearing the cache but keeping it > empty is not bad. Reduceing locks with nscache is actually a big deal > but at this point compatibility with old API is a higher priority, too > much production code. > > Let's see what Stephen will say :-)) > > Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > > > > On 11.12.2005, at 18:39, Vlad Seryakov wrote: > > > >> > >> Can we just put existing module into the core? It's been working good > >> in the past. > > > > > > I have nothing against. We use this module for years and it just works > > fine. > > I also like Stephens less-locking approach but only one thing bothers me > > there: inability to create new caches during runtime. > > I'd also accept "just creating and not tearing down" caches as this would > > suffice us.
Yes, good points. I've uploaded a new patch which merges everything into the core with minimal changes to existing C code. Let me know how this looks. Regarding API compatibility for Tcl code, I thought a wrapper ns_cache command could be added to the tcl/cache.tcl file. What do you think?
