Looks like a good patch, can you just commit it.
Happy Holidays!
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On 12/11/05, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, "just-create" policy is fine, clearing the cache but keeping it
empty is not bad. Reduceing locks with nscache is actually a big deal
but at this point compatibility with old API is a higher priority, too
much production code.
Let's see what Stephen will say :-))
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 11.12.2005, at 18:39, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Can we just put existing module into the core? It's been working good
in the past.
I have nothing against. We use this module for years and it just works
fine.
I also like Stephens less-locking approach but only one thing bothers me
there: inability to create new caches during runtime.
I'd also accept "just creating and not tearing down" caches as this would
suffice us.
Yes, good points. I've uploaded a new patch which merges everything
into the core with minimal changes to existing C code. Let me know
how this looks.
Regarding API compatibility for Tcl code, I thought a wrapper ns_cache
command could be added to the tcl/cache.tcl file. What do you think?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
_______________________________________________
naviserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
