On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:22:26PM +0100, Nicolas Trangez wrote: > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 19:06 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > Il 12/02/2013 18:37, Alex Bligh ha scritto: > > > For my education, why remove the FUA stuff? > > > > Because I had no way to test it. > > > > >>> > > Hmmm... the underlying storage could be md/dm RAIDs in which case > > >>> > > FUA > > >>> > > should be cheaper than FLUSH. > > >> > > > >> > If someone ever wrote a virtio-blk backend that sits directly ontop > > >> > of the Linux block layer that would be true. > > > In this case we don't know what the backend is sitting on top of > > > a-priori. It might be the current nbd server code, but it might > > > not be. > > > > Do you know of any other NBD server than the "official" one and qemu-nbd? > > Not used 'in production' (for now...), but yeah: > https://github.com/NicolasT/nbd
there's also xnbd, whose author decided it would be better to reimplement his own nbd-server from scratch. -- Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and save on postage. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
