On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:06:09 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> wrote:
> Il 12/02/2013 18:37, Alex Bligh ha scritto: > > For my education, why remove the FUA stuff? > > Because I had no way to test it. > > >>> > > Hmmm... the underlying storage could be md/dm RAIDs in which case FUA > >>> > > should be cheaper than FLUSH. > >> > > >> > If someone ever wrote a virtio-blk backend that sits directly ontop > >> > of the Linux block layer that would be true. > > In this case we don't know what the backend is sitting on top of > > a-priori. It might be the current nbd server code, but it might > > not be. > > Do you know of any other NBD server than the "official" one and qemu-nbd? > Obviously the changelog was inadequate. Please send along a new one which fully describes the reasons for this change. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
