On 18 Dec 2019, at 11:09, Jim Reid wrote:
On 18 Dec 2019, at 09:51, Daniel Karrenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
current policy is to not make it available because of privacy
concerns. Unless there is pressure from the community that is not
likely to change soon. I am no lawyer but I expect that this policy
could change at least for data that is not ‘personal data’, which
would be good enough for what you seek. But I guess that more than
two people have to ask for it. A reasonably concise request from this
WG would go a long way.
IMO it would be wiser to do this via the PDP. Doing this via some
other route is a recipe for confusion and inconsistency.
It doesn’t seem right to change/tweak existing policy on the fly
either.
That said, I see the value in making historical resource holder data
available and support that principle.
Jim,
Apologies for using the word policy without proper qualification. ;-)
As far as I know this is a RIPE NCC internal policy and not a RIPE
policy.
At least I could not quickly find a RIPE policy to this effect.
Best
Daniel
