|
This is all good stuff. What we're looking for in the nomination criteria is a list of things that you've done specifically for the project (Nebula in this case). Speaking very generally, being a committer on one project does not give you a free pass to join another project as a committer. You have to earn your way into every project on which you are a committer. The problem here is not one of whether or not you are qualified to join the project. There is a public record that--with some digging--I was able to uncover. The problem was that the nomination criteria did not spell it out. The basic idea is that we need a transparent record (in as easy a form to consume as possible) of the criteria by which every committer joins the project. The Technology PMC made a decision just a few weeks ago that--rather than simply rejecting nominations with insufficient nomination criteria--we'd dig to try and find it, make sure the demonstration of merit is adequately captured, and--assuming that all goes according to plan--approve the vote. HTH, Wayne On 01/13/2012 11:03 AM, Angelo zerr wrote: Hi Wayne, --
Wayne Beaton The Eclipse Foundation Twitter: @waynebeaton   |
_______________________________________________ nebula-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
