Both the manifest and the pom declare version 5.3 http://git.eclipse.org/c/nebula/org.eclipse.nebula.git/tree/widgets/gallery/org.eclipse.nebula.widgets.gallery/pom.xml
http://git.eclipse.org/c/nebula/org.eclipse.nebula.git/tree/widgets/gallery/org.eclipse.nebula.widgets.gallery/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Nicolas Richeton <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > I was reading your mail to the mailing list :-) . > There is an issue with the snapshot version produced by hudson. The > current number in the source code should probably by 0.5.5 or 0.6 (next > version). > > I have to check the source to confirm. > > -- > Nicolas > > > > Le 3 juin 2013 à 17:11, <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Hello Nicolas, > > I hope you don't find me forwarding this directly to you - I think you > might have some idea about what has happened. > > Thanks > > Matthew > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of > >> [email protected] > >> Sent: 03 June 2013 15:47 > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [nebula-dev] Confusion with version number of Nebula Gallery > >> > >> (extracted from http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/t/488348/) > >> > >> According to the web page for the Gallery widget > >> (http://www.eclipse.org/nebula/widgets/gallery/gallery.php, linked > from the main Nebula page), the > >> latest release version is v0.5.4_R_0_20110516. > >> > >> However, if I go to the main Nebula downloads page, the "snapshot" > repository has a version number of > >> 0.5.3.201305101602. Notice the lower version number (but later date). > >> > >> My guess is that the so-called "latest" version (v0.5.4_R_0_20110516) > was not published by building > >> from the standard Eclipse git repository, but instead someone build and > published it from a personal > >> copy of the repository, where they had edited the version number, and > maybe other things. > >> > >> Does anyone know what happened here? Any there other changes in the > "0.5.4" version that were never > >> pushed to the "official" repository where the snapshot is published > from? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Matthew > >> > >> nebula-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev > > > > > > -- > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and > or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. > If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the > addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not > use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to > the e-mail. > > Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual > and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. > > Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any > attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any > damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be > transmitted in or with the message. > > Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in > England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell > Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > nebula-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev >
_______________________________________________ nebula-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
