On Thursday, December 30, 2004, at 10:28:24 PM, Gary Feldman wrote:
> It's the first that concerns me, particularly with FIT and
> FitNesse. The table-driven testing language
> seems to give higher weight to easily writing test cases and
> easily implementing automation, and lower weight
> to making it easy to see the relationships between the test
> cases and the stories (or other antecedents).
I'd expect a team that felt they needed tests beyond Fit/FitNesse
would write them. Wouldn't you?
Ron Jeffries
www.XProgramming.com
Accroche toi a ton reve. --ELO
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
