On Friday, December 31, 2004, at 1:34:12 PM, Jason Yip wrote:
> - Commit often. Update even more often.
OK ...
> - The team is responsible for broken builds, not any particular
> individual or pair. Particular individuals or pairs involved in the
> latest change will be most capable in helping fix a broken build.
In the manual build case, if the build breaks, you know you did it.
The pair who need the learning are the pair presented with the
opportunity.
> - When a build breaks, it's an opportunity for us to learn how to
> improve our build, tests, and deployment process.
Well, except that no one's there.
> - "Live" builds that have occasional failures are preferred over
> "dead" builds that never break.
I don't understand this.
Ron Jeffries
www.XProgramming.com
The rules are ways of thinking, not ways to avoid thinking.
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
