Glad to hear MERGE will be faster in 2.0.1. Original issue was here: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neo4j/VTCmf_C4B0Q/cVIL7cFv-5cJ and I was using unique constraints.
On Friday, January 24, 2014 9:22:29 PM UTC, Wes Freeman wrote: > > Thanks. :) Merge for nodes will be a lot faster in 2.0.1 (thanks to > Alistair, Mark, et al. for coming up with a better happy path solution > that's much quicker). I guess I missed your specific issue, if you want to > link to it. Were you using unique constraints or plain indexes? > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:55 PM, icenine <[email protected] > <javascript:>>wrote: > >> Great webinar guys. Thanks for putting it on. I'm still waiting to hear >> back on my issue with create unique outperforming merge though ;-) >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
