That would be great, yes.

If you used an older version there might be issues, true

Am 11.04.2014 um 23:31 schrieb Zeeshan Arif <[email protected]>:

> I took the Importer from https://github.com/jexp/batch-import/tree/20
> 
> But, it may be couple of months older. It may not have all the latest 
> updates. Do you want to me to try that first?
> 
> Also, if the link is correct?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Zeeshan
> 
> On Friday, April 11, 2014 4:19:23 PM UTC-5, Michael Hunger wrote:
> Rather the import, can you share the download link where you pulled the 
> batch-importer from?
> 
> And the csv files you used for the import?
> 
> Michael
> 
> Am 11.04.2014 um 23:16 schrieb Zeeshan Arif <[email protected]>:
> 
>> I tried on a new directory and also later on a directory that was cleaned by 
>> the Import utility.
>> 
>> I used the batch importer providing it the node file as an input. The file 
>> does have some UTF characters which I escaped using commons-lang API. 
>> Nothing much special, it does import all nodes but only seemingly not 
>> showing the correct count on one of the Cypher queries. The non-labeled 
>> Cypher shows correct count using the labels(..) function.. That's what is 
>> surprising me..
>> 
>> Is it Cypher mis-behaving? or is it the import that could've gone wrong?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> - Zeeshan
>> 
>> On Friday, April 11, 2014 2:40:01 PM UTC-5, Michael Hunger wrote:
>> Probably a glitch in the importer.
>> 
>> If you delete the schema directory, the label scan store is rebuild on 
>> startup.
>> 
>> After that it should be ok.
>> 
>> How _exactly_ did you import your data?
>> 
>> Michael
>> 
>> Am 11.04.2014 um 21:22 schrieb Zeeshan Arif <[email protected]>:
>> 
>>> Using Neo4j 2.0.1 and batch-import 2.0
>>> 
>>> I am facing a strange discrepancy.. I have imported 831 nodes into Neo4j 
>>> using batch import. There is a lucene index on these nodes and a Label. The 
>>> count of 831 nodes is also listed by the import program.
>>> 
>>> When I execute this query - and the results vary on 2 different machines on 
>>> the count.
>>> 
>>> #1 match (t:someLabel) return count(t); // I get 828 rows.
>>> 
>>> If I execute this:
>>> 
>>> #2 match (t) WHERE labels(t) = ["someLabel"] return t; // I get all 831 
>>> rows. 
>>> 
>>> Why should this be happening?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> - Zeeshan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Neo4j" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Neo4j" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Neo4j" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to