Ok, that worked! The latest Importer has fixes for these kind of issues ..

Thanks,

- Zeeshan

On Friday, April 11, 2014 4:34:08 PM UTC-5, Michael Hunger wrote:
>
> That would be great, yes.
>
> If you used an older version there might be issues, true
>
> Am 11.04.2014 um 23:31 schrieb Zeeshan Arif <[email protected]<javascript:>
> >:
>
> I took the Importer from https://github.com/jexp/batch-import/tree/20
>
> But, it may be couple of months older. It may not have all the latest 
> updates. Do you want to me to try that first?
>
> Also, if the link is correct?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Zeeshan
>
> On Friday, April 11, 2014 4:19:23 PM UTC-5, Michael Hunger wrote:
>>
>> Rather the import, can you share the download link where you pulled the 
>> batch-importer from?
>>
>> And the csv files you used for the import?
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> Am 11.04.2014 um 23:16 schrieb Zeeshan Arif <[email protected]>:
>>
>> I tried on a new directory and also later on a directory that was cleaned 
>> by the Import utility.
>>
>> I used the batch importer providing it the node file as an input. The 
>> file does have some UTF characters which I escaped using commons-lang API. 
>> Nothing much special, it does import all nodes but only seemingly not 
>> showing the correct count on one of the Cypher queries. The non-labeled 
>> Cypher shows correct count using the labels(..) function.. That's what is 
>> surprising me..
>>
>> Is it Cypher mis-behaving? or is it the import that could've gone wrong?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Zeeshan
>>
>> On Friday, April 11, 2014 2:40:01 PM UTC-5, Michael Hunger wrote:
>>>
>>> Probably a glitch in the importer.
>>>
>>> If you delete the schema directory, the label scan store is rebuild on 
>>> startup.
>>>
>>> After that it should be ok.
>>>
>>> How _exactly_ did you import your data?
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> Am 11.04.2014 um 21:22 schrieb Zeeshan Arif <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> Using Neo4j 2.0.1 and batch-import 2.0
>>>
>>> I am facing a strange discrepancy.. I have imported 831 nodes into Neo4j 
>>> using batch import. There is a lucene index on these nodes and a Label. The 
>>> count of 831 nodes is also listed by the import program.
>>>
>>> When I execute this query - and the results vary on 2 different machines 
>>> on the count.
>>>
>>> #1 match (t:someLabel) return count(t); // I get 828 rows.
>>>
>>> If I execute this:
>>>
>>> #2 match (t) WHERE labels(t) = ["someLabel"] return t; // I get all 831 
>>> rows. 
>>>
>>> Why should this be happening?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> - Zeeshan
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Neo4j" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Neo4j" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Neo4j" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to