Right I agree with Tom, currently you get this in structr (even when importing Neo4j databases, e.g. from a GraphGist).
It definitely makes sense to have a feature like that. For Neo4j this is on the roadmap too, but not in the immediate future, it's more a capacity issue :) Am 16.07.2014 um 23:18 schrieb Tom Zeppenfeldt <t.zeppenfe...@ophileon.com>: > sounds like structr.org may be something you want to look at .. > > > > > Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards > > > > Ir. T. Zeppenfeldt > van der Waalsstraat 30 > 6706 JR Wageningen > The Netherlands > > Mobile: +31 6 23 28 78 06 > Phone: +31 3 17 84 22 17 > E-mail: t.zeppenfe...@ophileon.com > Web: www.ophileon.com > Twitter: tomzeppenfeldt > Skype: tomzeppenfeldt > > > 2014-07-16 22:28 GMT+02:00 Jason Gillman Jr. <mackdaddydie...@gmail.com>: > I was just wondering if the ability to utilize a schema of sorts was on the > road map. > > When I say schema, I'm thinking more along the lines of relational > constraints. > > Let's use the following simple example. > > We have the following types of entities represented by node labels > (:`Server`) > (:`Switch`) > (:`Physical Interface`) > > Then we would want to enforce the following relations (I would think these > restrictions would seem intuitive): > > (:`Server`)-[:`Contains`]->(:`Physical Interface`) > (:`Switch`)-[:`Contains`]->(:`Physical Interface`) > (:`Physical Interface`)-[:`Connects`]-(:`Physical Interface`) > > > Basically, to ensure data consistency without having to build it into an > application, we would want it so that Neo4j would not allow, for example, a > Server to connect to another Server, or a Switch, nor would we want to make a > Physical Interface contain a Server. > > Is something like this in the plans? Of course the use of these constraints > would be completely optional. > > Thanks! > > -Jason > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
