Just ran into the following article (published supposedly today Jun 04, 2015) which claims to contain comparison of benchmark results: Native multi-model can compete with pure document and graph databases <https://www.arangodb.com/2015/06/multi-model-benchmark/> which makes me think that there is something wrong with either their data model or with test setup, because results for Neo4j are surprisingly low.
Am I the only one out there who feel the same? WBR, Andrii -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
