I have looked at their repository too. Most of the queries seems 'almost' correct, but there is no information concerning the real schema indexes, the configuration of the JVM etc.., also the results are the throughput so I wait for someone maybe more experimented in these kind of benchmarks in order to reply to it.
Le vendredi 5 juin 2015 04:32:59 UTC+2, Michael Hunger a écrit : > > I'm currently on the road but there are several things wrong with it. Will > look into more detail in the next few days > > Michael > > Von meinem iPhone gesendet > > Am 04.06.2015 um 12:57 schrieb Andrii Stesin <[email protected] > <javascript:>>: > > Just ran into the following article (published supposedly today Jun 04, > 2015) which claims to contain comparison of benchmark results: Native > multi-model can compete with pure document and graph databases > <https://www.arangodb.com/2015/06/multi-model-benchmark/> which makes me > think that there is something wrong with either their data model or with > test setup, because results for Neo4j are surprisingly low. > > Am I the only one out there who feel the same? > > WBR, > Andrii > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
