Cannot comment on stack over flow yet, but definately a way to solve query #0 and #1 is needed in neo4j.
Answer from Micheal at: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26497068/lucene-in-neo4j-has-some-misbehaviours-in-terms-of-reliable-search-querys-comp any tutorial in python (neo4j-rest-client ?) (not java, or if only java please share an how to cause I don't know where to put the hands... :)) for implementing a sorting on lucene and get meaningful results in queries like: query#0 ?? Il giorno mercoledì 5 novembre 2014 15:06:56 UTC+1, Curtis Mosters ha scritto: > > Yeah, kind of all of these querys are already answered by myself. Please > look here for statements or solutions > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26497068/lucene-in-neo4j-has-some-misbehaviours-in-terms-of-reliable-search-querys-comp > > And for sure the Querys were not matching, that is true. If you have > anything to add on top of my answer, also feel free to comment on > stackoverflow. > > Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2014 14:31:24 UTC+1 schrieb Andrii Stesin: >> >> Dear Curtis, >> >> what is the setup of your `titles` index looks like? Is it really of type >> `fulltext` and has `to_lower_case` set to `true` in it's configuration >> options? Please confirm. >> >> Also looking at your Cypher queries I suspect that #3 uses a syntax >> suitable for `exact` index not for `fulltext` (quotes misplaced?) same >> question applies to #4 and #5. >> >> WBR, >> Andrii >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
