Hi Ratul, If you don't mind send me the Cypher script that you used to create it. I keep the info confidential.
My design of keeping the route number as the root node should work. I can try with your data and let you know. Thanks, -Kamal On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Ratul Jain <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 1:00:41 AM UTC+5:30, Kamal Murthy wrote: >> >> ~snip >>> >> > Hi Kamal, > > Thank you so much for taking your time to answer my query. > > My initial model was kind of similar but this design doesn't scale > well. At some point I had multiple [:TO] relationships between various > stops and that is when the query started to become really slow. > > This is the screenshot of my previous model. > > > <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-GR2MxCM1CLs/WUDnBa_TCAI/AAAAAAAACH4/u7q240cyUVI_xqXHtq2aPjsgeYHHzwRVACLcBGAs/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2017-06-13%2Bat%2B1.12.58%2BPM.png> > > That's the main reason the routes are denoted as an array property rather > than their own relationship. > > Thanks, > Ratul > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/neo4j/_xNewWFaxOU/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
