Hi Kamal, Sure, I'll set up a test instance with some dummy data.
Thanks, Ratul On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 8:57:09 PM UTC+5:30, Kamal Murthy wrote: > > Hi Ratul, > > If you don't mind send me the Cypher script that you used to create it. I > keep the info confidential. > > My design of keeping the route number as the root node should work. I can > try with your data and let you know. > > Thanks, > -Kamal > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Ratul Jain <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 1:00:41 AM UTC+5:30, Kamal Murthy wrote: >>> >>> ~snip >>>> >>> >> Hi Kamal, >> >> Thank you so much for taking your time to answer my query. >> >> My initial model was kind of similar but this design doesn't scale >> well. At some point I had multiple [:TO] relationships between various >> stops and that is when the query started to become really slow. >> >> This is the screenshot of my previous model. >> >> >> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-GR2MxCM1CLs/WUDnBa_TCAI/AAAAAAAACH4/u7q240cyUVI_xqXHtq2aPjsgeYHHzwRVACLcBGAs/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2017-06-13%2Bat%2B1.12.58%2BPM.png> >> >> That's the main reason the routes are denoted as an array property rather >> than their own relationship. >> >> Thanks, >> Ratul >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "Neo4j" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neo4j/_xNewWFaxOU/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
