Joe?
How do you wish to progress?
On 12/8/06, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/8/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "the X Window System" is an abstraction used to arbitrate access to the
> display+IO devices: a daemon (the X server) acts as the intermediary and
> apps talk to that daemon via a library over a socket. That's exactly
> analogous to the idea I talked about by no coincidence.
I still can access /dev/mem, /dev/fb or /dev/mouse in order to bypass X.
It is long time since I last used X, but if I remember correctly there
is a log of global context in its libraries. If you want me I can take
a look on that also.
Now that we understand that we don't add a new problem to the
implementation, can we make a progress?
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
_______________________________________________
neon mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.webdav.org/mailman/listinfo/neon
