Hello Joe, A new year... Do you want to make some progress in this issue?
Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. On 12/20/06, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe? How do you wish to progress? On 12/8/06, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/8/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "the X Window System" is an abstraction used to arbitrate access to the > > display+IO devices: a daemon (the X server) acts as the intermediary and > > apps talk to that daemon via a library over a socket. That's exactly > > analogous to the idea I talked about by no coincidence. > > I still can access /dev/mem, /dev/fb or /dev/mouse in order to bypass X. > It is long time since I last used X, but if I remember correctly there > is a log of global context in its libraries. If you want me I can take > a look on that also. > > Now that we understand that we don't add a new problem to the > implementation, can we make a progress? > > Best Regards, > Alon Bar-Lev. >
_______________________________________________ neon mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.webdav.org/mailman/listinfo/neon
