Wow.  $6 each.
I only have about 35 left, but I wasn't lucky enough to pay those  prices.  
When I finish my time machine, I will go back and get a  bunch.  :)
 
Never having touched a tube with 92, I can't say.  Rubbing off?   Well, I 
tend to keep my fingers off, so I don't know how easy it is to rub  off.
 
Out of curiosity, about how many tubes were you looking at getting and did  
the date really have to be 92/10?
 
Michail
 
 
 
In a message dated 11/21/2010 1:21:42 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Hello  chums, Over the years, I have bought many batches of IN18 nixie
tubes -  starting when they were USD $6 each! (*sigh* - happy
memories...). I bought  one batch a few years back labeled 92/10 -
suspicious, because unlike  earlier tubes, the markings rubbed off very
easily. I was never convinced  that these were really tubes of that
date, concluding that they were  probably remarked (happens a lot in
Semiconductor World) in the hope of  getting a better price.

Now I see those same dated tubes back on the  market, but I think it
would take more than the proverbial barge pole to  persuade me to deal
with the particular individual - he seems to "lose" a  lot of stuff in
the post!

So - what do we think - genuine, end-of  line IN18s (and maybe the
production line were getting a bit sloppy with  the dab of varnish on
the rear of each tube, that late on), or  FAKE?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to  the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email  to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email  to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this  group at  
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to