I enjoyed reading that wiki article. It remembered me of doing a redesign
of a rather elaborate opamp design done by someone who didn't understand
gain-bandwidth to begin with. I got rid of ~70% of the components, got rid
of the tedious calibration procedure, and replaced very expensive opamps
with
low cost jelly beans LM358. And it produced a much cleaner signal.
That was not "Muntzing" of cource, but I can imagine that (lousy enough)
designs
can benefit from it. That is something I could dream about - like winning a
Muntzing
Award, a 24K gold plated cutter on a nice piece of polished wood or
something ;-)
Frank
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick" <[email protected]>
To: "neonixie-l" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 9:56 PM
Subject: [neonixie-l] Re: OT: Muntzing
[snip]
Basically, what he did was to remove bits of a good system until it
stopped working, and then just put the last bit back. It was never
good engineering, it was about being cheap and nasty. He went bust.
No professional engineer worth his salt would ever dream of
"Muntzing". Not ever.
Nick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.
