Dear Dalibor,

Photolitography devices are original pieces. It was used for polish industrial nixies, but rather for laboratory scale. When prototypes were good, manufacturing go to Dolam, Wroclaw. I suppose that there were similiar devices, but bigger. I used hydrochloric acid with perhydrol H2O2 and pure water. I'm going to try with molybdenum foil and cupric foil for another parts, not for nixies.

I'm very tired now. That's why I must go to sleep. I promise you answer good as quick as possible.

Alek

W dniu 2012-09-29 09:56, Dalibor Farný pisze:

Wooow!

Alek, this is really outstanding result! Could I ask You what etching chemical did You use? FeCl3? And how did You agitated the etching process, I just immersed the metal into etching solution.. some kind of spray tank is the best way.. did You heat the etching solution?

So the photolitography devices are original pieces? Industry made nixie's metal parts were made using this?

I will send You 0.1mm stanless steel sheet to do another test if You want, just send me your address to my email.

Could You please send a photo of assembled device?

Sorry for so many demands :-)

Dalibor Farný
http://dalibor.farny.cz

sent from Samsung Galaxy Pad

Dne 28.9.2012 22:06 "Alek onet" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> napsal(a):

    "accelerated" by Dalibor I tried my photolitography devices. It's
    very good, even using first time! It isn't simple technology but I'm
    very glad. In the second picture you have anode of nixie tube
    prepared from template of polish tube type LC513. Unfortunatelly I
    had old
    photosensitive lacquer and thick metal plate (0.2 mm).

    www.tubedevices.com/alek/pwl/lc1d/fotolito.jpg
    <http://www.tubedevices.com/alek/pwl/lc1d/fotolito.jpg>
    www.tubedevices.com/alek/pwl/lc1d/fotolito1.jpg
    <http://www.tubedevices.com/alek/pwl/lc1d/fotolito1.jpg>

    Best regards
    Alek

            it is not so easy, the total surface of each digit should
            be constant to achieve constant current and constant
            brightness of each digit (else You will have to struggle
            with resistors on cathodes..). Bigger number = higher
            current..

        While this is true, it isn't an absolute.  Existing nixies
        have different currents for different digits (particularlay
        "1").  Since they're more-or-less constant
        voltage devices, the anode resistor tends to even out the
        different current draws.  Running nixies from higher voltages
        with larger anode resistors
        helps with this (at the cost of efficiency).  Some designs
        actually use current regulation instead of anode resistors,
        and these will tend to overdrive
        the smaller digits slightly.

        That said, it would be simple enough to write code to adjust
        the digit stroke thicknesses to achieve matching total areas.
         Note that in some nixies,
        the "1" digit is made with a double stroke to help with this.

            And I also like the retro look of original digits ;-)

        That is a perfectly valid reason.  If I were going to clone a
        nixie, I'd choose the CD-66 with its particularly nice digit
        shapes.

        However, if I'm making my own nixies, I'd be interested in
        making them visibly distinct from existing ones.  If I want a
        CD-66, I
        can just go buy one (unless I want a CD-66 with 30mm digits).
         If I want a nixie with Böcklin or Klingon digits, I'll have
        to make
        my own.

        There's also a mechanical consideration - thicker digits will
        be more rigid and stable, and should survive longer.  However,
        this thickness can be in material thickness or stroke width.

            Once I have working tube (as close as possible to
            original) I can play and change things inside..

        Absolutely.  Coming up with digit shapes is likely not the
        most difficult problem in making nixies.

            Have You made something working with mentioned digit graphics?

        Not as of yet.  My original plan was to photoetch them, but I
        just heard from someone who's making custom variable
        capacitor plates, and has access to a water jet cutter.

        I've been pricing the little ceramic rings used as insulating
        digit separators, and they're expensive, so now I'm thinking
        of glass and mica as alternatives.

        - John


-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "neonixie-l" group.
    To post to this group, send an email to
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:neonixie-l%[email protected]>.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to