Scrub the C3/C4 check, you mentioned that it was functioning OK on the
seconds, so that's no an issue....apologies for that! ;-)

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Nicholas Stock <[email protected]> wrote:

> Have you checked the soldering on the connectors for the tube sockets?
> Sounds like you may have a short either on the minute socket or daughter
> board you used for the minutes. The 5V rail is functioning OK as the LED's
> light as you say, if the HV is only reading 12 to 13V then your assessment
> of the HV generator going kaput is probably correct. If you've already
> changed the IRFD220, then check the other parts in the HV circuit....are
> the Caps C3 and C4 the correct way round (an easy mistake, I've done that
> one before..;-)..
>
> Have you discussed with Pete? He's the best resource for this obviously
> and very helpful....hope you get it sorted, they're great little clocks.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nick
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:33 PM, barnbwt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Glad to finally get this question in front of people who might be able to
>> help.  Sorry in advance for the long post; just trying to be thorough for
>> good measure :)
>>
>> I very recently dove into the circuit-building hobby, specifically Nixie
>> clocks.  The PV Electronics kit seemed like a pretty good starting point
>> for someone with undeveloped solder skills, and even less electronics
>> knowledge, to work at expanding both.  I would say this has definitely been
>> the case, but it hasn't been without the expected learning curve.
>>
>> I completed the low voltage and high circuits per their directions (QTC
>> clock instructions & diagram pdf
>> <http://www.pvelectronics.co.uk/kits/qtc/qtc_v11a.pdf>) and ran the
>> simple voltage tests across the 5V and 175V portions, all went well.  I
>> subsequently added the remaining components, and began the final test to
>> light up a tube.  The seconds-place position worked great, just as I'd
>> hoped, but moving to the minutes position didn't work out so well.
>> Plugging the power supply into wall yielded a number of effects, none of
>> them good.
>>
>> -Something going sizzle...
>> -The minutes tube either drawing voltage backward, or
>> cathode-to--cathode, with purple flashes at its lower interior portion
>> (this the same tube that ran fine in the seconds position)
>> -All RGB LEDs which had previously illuminated blue (the default start
>> condition, I assume) were now fully lit to make a violet color (all
>> elements full blast)
>> -Before promptly yanking the power supply after a second or so, I saw all
>> these signs start to fade or draw down (brightness and sizzle)
>>
>> So, the project fried, I discharged all capacitors and set to (more)
>> carefully inspecting my handiwork.  I found what I thought was a single
>> tiny solder bridge that may have shorted one of the resistors in series
>> with an RGB LED and fixed it, but I wouldn't think that would cause such
>> theatrics.  I assume that there was a short or polarity-swap in the second
>> Nixie socket, which I guess could allow more driving current than desired
>> and cook some things (the transistor at each Nixie that I assume is acting
>> as a control relay, the logic IC controlling those transistors, the MOSFET
>> supplying the high voltage, or the voltage regulator supplying the low)
>>
>> -As best I can tell, the switching transistors for each tube look intact
>> (no obvious burns, cracks, etc.) but I don't think I can test them easily
>> while soldered in place
>> -The anode IC and cathode IC look intact, though again, no way to tell if
>> they are burned internally
>> -I did a resistance check across all capacitors, and they are
>> charging/discharging, though I don't have a great way to measure Faradays
>> (just a multimeter)
>> -All diodes appear to still be resisting current in the right direction
>> -The 5V power supply circuit is still testing good
>> -The high voltage power supply was not amplifying (12V in, 13V out
>> instead of ~175V)
>>
>> The last point suggested that voltage amplifying transistor was shorted
>> and non-functional, so I removed it (it easily broke apart as I did so) and
>> replaced it.  The high voltage circuit still reads the same afterwards, as
>> are the fully lit LEDs (no sizzle, though, and only the 'red' is
>> illuminated after removing the solder bridge), and that is as far as my
>> problem solving has carried me.  One point worth mentioning, is that the
>> board is attempting to draw too much current, which causes the
>> self-resetting fuse to disengage (the "fading" I saw initially also
>> occurred during this subsequent testing of the HV circuit, but momentarily
>> shorting the fuse lit the LEDs right back up).
>>
>> I'm a mechanical design engineer.  This stuff ain't my bag, not yet
>> anyway.  But as best I can tell, the logic side of the circuit diagram
>> suggests the 'anode' IC can tell it's not getting 175V and may be lighting
>> the LEDs fully by default (as opposed to those connections being cooked,
>> which I'd assume would cook the LEDs themselves).  The 'cathode' IC
>> directly meters the needed juice to the Nixies, so it is possible/likely it
>> was damaged during the high current excursion, but there is not the
>> visible/olfactory signs I'd expect of the distinct sizzling I caused.  I
>> don't think the 'anode' IC could be exposed to damaging current from the
>> Nixie portion of the board, unless both layers of switching transistors
>> shorted source-drain (I'd think this would also cause some dramatic results
>> in the 6 transistors involved).  So, my theory is that the problem still
>> lies in the high voltage generation circuit...somewhere.  I suppose I could
>> blindly start replacing stuff, but I'd like to at least chase the most
>> likely issues first.
>>
>> To anyone who made it this far, and has a suggestion, I salute you.  Many
>> thanks, regardless.
>>
>> TCB
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "neonixie-l" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/7cf1fb99-10ae-4260-9a93-402c3ee04d0e%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/7cf1fb99-10ae-4260-9a93-402c3ee04d0e%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAOX%2BRH%2BHgjJ_DorMm0ZgNZstj3drmpSsnczAOWwMg8Vfm-My8Q%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to