The TI CD4511B datasheet lists the lists the *minimum* high level output 
(at 5v VDD) of 4.1v but typical is 4.55v, maybe others are different?

https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cd4511b.pdf

At 4.55v the segment current on the IV-9 is going to be about 25ma. Typical 
IV-9 segment current is about 20ma I believe, so that would be a 25% 
overdrive.

I've put up a drive voltage vs segment current table on my site, maybe it's 
useful to someone: http://www.neonixie.com/IV-9-6D-RR/#tech

I settled with powering the tubes in my designs in one of two ways.. 5.0v 
direct with a recommended PWM of about 65% (the 165 (out of 255) value in 
the table) OR 5v through a regular silicon diode, dropping the voltage to 
about 4.2v at the tube and PWM that to 76%. Both result in a segment 
current of 20ma. Don't know if one or the other is better in regards to 
lifetime, I was not able to find any official sources of information. I 
experimented with driving them using a 3.3v regulator.. but at that voltage 
they were a bit dim.

NOTE: The IV-9 datasheet does mention to avoid running the tubes at a 
frequency between 105 and 1000 Hz, presumably to avoid mechanical 
resonance. I elected to run them at 1600 Hz.

I looked through some of my testing data.. at a segment current of 3mA the 
segments are visible, 2mA they are "barely visible" and at 1mA I noted them 
as not visible. Keeping the unlit segments warm with a slight current seems 
to make the most sense to me. It's all software on my clock so maybe an 
option for the next revision.

That's all I know so far.

Regards,
-Moses
On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 5:52:05 AM UTC-8 [email protected] wrote:

> Hi Chris,
>
>  
>
> The numitrons are driven by a 4511 decoder, and according to their data 
> sheets the max. output at that voltage is 4.1 V, so that is well within 
> specification for the tube. Yes, I agree, lowering the voltage even further 
> should increase lifespan.
>
>  
>
> Bill v
>
>  
>
> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> *On Behalf 
> Of *Chris
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 04, 2023 8:19 AM
> *To:* neonixie-l <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [neonixie-l] Re: IV-9 numitron lifespan
>
>  
>
> Hi,
>
> While i am not sure for the IV9 numitrons have a look at the DA2300 
> lifetime expectancy,
>
>
>
> Basically reducing the voltage increases the life expectancy 
> exponentially. 
>
> So i usually run my numitrons at 4.5V or lower and have had no issues so 
> far.
>
> On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 8:05:48 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:
>
> I seem to recall there was some discussion on the life expectancy of IV-9 
> numitrons some time ago. 
>
>  
>
> In 2015 I built a number of clocks with these tubes, and they started 
> failing last year. The clock in the picture is on my bench now, the three 
> good tubes were replaced in November last year. So today all 6 tubes will 
> be replaced. I have replaced all 6 tubes on a few other clocks also. One or 
> more segments will no longer light up, and I do not see any blackening of 
> the glass tube (The black you see in the picture is my permanent marker, s 
> I will not replace the wrong tube when I disconnect the power).
>
>  
>
> The tubes are driven directly from a 4511 chip on a 5V power line.
>
>  
>
> There does not seem to be any order in which they fail, so I do not have 
> the feeling that any of the tubes are significantly impacted by thermal 
> stresses from flashing on and off. I would say based on my experience with 
> them, the expected lifespan is about 7 years of continues use.
>
>  
>
> Bill v
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "neonixie-l" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/81b5b7e6-d476-4b83-9a8e-c9d6cc468db9n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/81b5b7e6-d476-4b83-9a8e-c9d6cc468db9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/92508839-33de-4b2b-8603-e3e6cb686b29n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to