I'm playing around a bit more with some active filter designs so it won't 
be load dependent, but 100khz seems a bit high for this application. Going 
a lower frequency would require I select a different/larger transformer 
since my current would be too high.
On Saturday, 15 April 2023 at 03:26:46 UTC-4 ZY wrote:

> I wanted to try to avoid having a AC line in my design if possible. I did 
> have to break out my old ECE notes, and I designed a different filter. 
> Turns out my original RC filter requires a much larger resistor to limit 
> the primary side current, but that raises input resistance too high for my 
> 40 ohm loads.
>
> Using a different filter I had some more success:
>
> https://www.falstad.com/circuit/circuitjs.html?ctz=CQAgjCDsB0AcYCYCsBTAtLEAGaBOWuYALFrgGwDMFRSSkSZIuuISrWr6YYAUAG7hE4Mh24IQRTB3FgscudjiKpipP0HiKZTGJDJG08PIU4pSitGJgkuBGSQUkBSLgqqeAcw3DRQsLexsT28tHSESDkieAHdvSXAA+KweACdWBB0M9J0AjhIeMDIWBBJwLIiylRx5WWY6+oaWMGhSAixato6zfzIiESJuJCxIWoRIEDQcYiwKSHbIMgQqWDkRiamSWfnF5bkqRWYYiQV-cT6iBPFkgSIKcRK8u70sKuPwQMjoNViKwseZERBH5PP4SJ4IF5BLy3e6lGF6SBXIESXqXbJo5IAYxRF0QmHOGL0lghxlJ8gQ6HG1RGuBGiGYFFsGUIyKQWVOrAWGKOdEYePR-OSsV5lRAIkyUiOHPiDwkktiun0elKSqFyukDHV3OFXI54u1Yshes1HLV+v59j5WTVsplpUFPAANjjRWyJR8WsZMJMWgwiCMEORbrBqBQhMlnb9yqjBYpjCVFNMtmAFksKCssJQgmkRfzc7ljqlDe7zQX8mlLaLK6bCwB7QIQURIay0ViKC6GDgUHj1tiN56SNwIL5xvt6Nvd3vvcZgRwpthsKbjxstSDwZA8IA
>
> However the problem is the output voltage is somewhat determined by the 
> load. So if a filament burns out it can cause a cascade failure on the 
> other filaments as the voltage rises. I guess monitoring the AC line would 
> be possible but this complicates my design a bit, and I'd need a monitor 
> that could do negative currents/voltages if my bias is not high enough. If 
> such an IC exists I'd be interested, but I don't really have access to a 
> FPGA if that's what it takes.
>
> It also seems it's easy to hit resonance with particular filter LC values, 
> boosting the voltage higher which feels a bit dangerous for the filaments.
>
> Maybe just not having the filter would be the safest approach here. 
> However I'm not at all experienced in filter design especially when there 
> is a low impedance load involved, so maybe there's a better approach that 
> I'm not using.
>
> On Saturday, 15 April 2023 at 02:03:39 UTC-4 gregebert wrote:
>
>> I use a mains-powered 2.5VAC center-tapped transformer for my NIMO clock, 
>> and apply a DC bias to the center-tap. Basically the same as your approach, 
>> but not running at 100kHz. The DC bias comes from a DAC (with an OP-amp 
>> buffer), so I can use software to control the offset, rather than a pot. No 
>> need for LC filters, etc.
>>
>> The transformer is rated at 3amps, even though 6 NIMO tubes only require 
>> 1.2amps max. Also, each tube has it's own fuse and series resistor to 
>> reduce the inrush current. The software-controlled DAC is also necessary so 
>> I can have the FPGA monitor analog signals to check the fuses, filaments, 
>> and resistors, and that has to be timed correctly to the AC line and the 
>> offset has to be different for making these measurements than for regular 
>> operation. It was probably overkill, but I enjoyed the design challenge.
>>
>> On Friday, April 14, 2023 at 2:25:57 PM UTC-7 ZY wrote:
>>
>>> Hello. I'm working on a driver for my VFD filaments. Say I need a 
>>> Vfilament of 1.6V, and a current of 40mA, such as with a small VFD.
>>>
>>> So far I have a square wave driver set up, basically for my two filament 
>>> pins I can alternate the two pins between 1.6 and 0 with some H bridge at 
>>> maybe 100KHz. If I connect the filament load to this, it's the equivalent 
>>> of using a 3.2V Vpp square wave biased at 0v. See Sim Link 1. I put two 40 
>>> ohm resistors as a stand in for 2 VFD tubes filaments in parallel.
>>>
>>> However, I'd like to add some sort of smoothing and DC bias. I was 
>>> thinking of using a small transformer, such as this one:
>>> https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/445/750315240-3096542.pdf
>>> Applying a 100KHz RC low pass filter to the output, and approximating 
>>> the turn ratio at 1:1 (it's 1:1.1 in the datasheet but ignoring that for 
>>> now), I have a simulation below as Sim Link 2.
>>>
>>> The problem here is I seem to be wasting a huge amount of power just 
>>> driving the transformer on the primary size. The plot on the very far left 
>>> shows I'm delivering 2.2A to the transformer. I guess I could find a larger 
>>> transformer with a higher inductance, or increase my switching frequency, 
>>> but I'm not sure if I'm on the right design path here.
>>>
>>> Also, it seems like some of my issues stem from my LC filter. If I 
>>> remove that, the simulation shows more reasonable primary currents of 
>>> 100mA. See Sim Link 2. I don't really remember my ECE courses from a long 
>>> time ago, so I'm not sure what is going on here.
>>>
>>> Anyone have any suggestions?
>>>
>>>
>>> Sim Link 1:
>>>
>>> https://www.falstad.com/circuit/circuitjs.html?ctz=CQAgjCDsB0AcYCYCsBTAtLEAGaBOWuYALFrgGwDMFRSSkSZIuuISrWr6YYAUAG7hE4Mh24IQRTB3FgscudjiKpipP0HiKZTGJDJG08PIU4pSitGJgkuBGSQUkBSLgqqeAcw3DRQsLexsT28tHSESDkieAHdvSXAA+KweACdWBB0M9J0AjhIYiQV-cSIyIgTxZNjS8sRMJCy6oOqyiuy25LS6RibujsKChpzxPuLm1kgerKHwLKq2+IQSCSkC3X09ZY35pekGTdFcgt3ZzAjT8fOxk7H5q6yai53lxeWm5IB7QIhRJGtaViKcqGDgUHhfNg-PRYSRuBDQNg4LCQvSAsEQ8BQcCOMD0QE4CAyRRYSDwZA8IA
>>>
>>> Sim Link 2:
>>>
>>> https://www.falstad.com/circuit/circuitjs.html?ctz=CQAgjCDsB0AcYCYCsBTAtLEAGaBOWuYALFrgGwDMFRSSkSZIuuISrWr6YYAUAG7hE4Mh24IQRTB3FgscudjiKpipP0HiKZTGJDJG08PIU4pSitGJgkuBGSQUkBSLgqqeAcw3DRQsLexsT28tHSESDkieAHdvSXAA+KweACdWBB0M9J0AjhIeMDIWBBJwLIiylRx5WWY6+oaWMGhSAixato7MNGbEWAYsCgRZMGosLOaseiIie2ItSARSGRbp2aR5skXhokVmGIkFf3FZ3eOggSIhvVKr8SWqw-BAyOg1WIrCvOuvoI+fkQSa4PIJeO43b73RYvA6nSrZeHJAAOIBEmUwaL0DBAbiiXkx+lRWEwCGhUQ+ZDOASQE1yqUOonKlMR4B4AGMJMy+pyqeJXsZ2oxmrAtHZ4IMiIRILpqu16XQhVkFQk+YcDjScuJledkrFtUqJlldaxIIqMcTEQdzvESnkpFahITbViDAdnU7Sjr2RCJCTPUbFMYIDgiIgMuQyKT8JJyIG5QB7QLB8AbWhsNgWVWqig8RNsZNLSRuBBvRQQCBanG51jPSDgRxgeg1nAV54thjIaujNuHfDNyw41lAA
>>>
>>> Sim Link 3, no LC Filter:
>>>
>>> https://www.falstad.com/circuit/circuitjs.html?ctz=CQAgjCDsB0AcYCYCsBTAtLEAGaBOWuYALFrgGwDMFRSSkSZIuuISrWr6YYAUAG7hE4Mh24IQRTB3FgscudjiKpipP0HiKZTGJDJG08PIU4pSitGJgkuBGSQUkBSLgqqeAcw3DRQsLexsT28tHSESDkieAHdvSXAA+KweACdWBB0M9J0AjhIeMDIWBBJwLIiylRx5WWY6+oaWMGhSAixato6zRGsiOyJILApEXEgyCDRq2AQKWG1ISAQ7OhE2SZbp2fnF5bGhxWYYiQV-cSIyIgTxZIEiCnESvPu9LCrj8EDI6DVYisKnmQiIK-Z7-CTPBCvIJeO4PUqwvSLT5Hc6XRCYJBZdFBAAOIBEmUwBL0DBAbiiXmJ+nxUIQSKivwuV2yzOSaRWlVYY1ZxyOmJy4g5p2BXMY2P5nOSsSFWWJ2KlzPijwkUiOumpyupCs1pOVwuSAGM9PDMHqsl9jBApmQRAhRhQsJJRrgsNcWu0USdykz5TwAPaBK3gJDWWisRSXQwcCj+8NByGSNxsHAyPThmMBtgQSDgRxgejhnAQVM4MjIWNgNxBkj4QuWMngHhAA
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/c9cc8a3e-a614-4c10-9017-7096b07f3cf7n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to