Richard,

Same here! I started to experiment with the IV-21 tube and how to drive it 
recently. I have some drivers on the way. I don't have much experience with 
VFDs at the moment.. but I did light one up on the bench recently.

I used the datasheet recommended filament voltage/current on the IV-21 of 
about 2.7v at 35ma, and I lit up all the segments/girds manually without a 
driver IC. With everything on, I was able to perceive a difference in the 
brightness but I had to be looking for it, it was not obvious. Now in 
operation as a clock, as opposed to a static display with all segments on, 
I would expect it to be less noticeable.

The IV-21 is one of those 8 digit small calculator type tubes, the filament 
is about 40cm long or so. I believe the IV-22 single digit tube would have 
a shorter filament, and hence less of an effect? Maybe.

Keep us updated on your progress.

Regards,
-Moses

On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 10:45:02 PM UTC-7 Richard Scales wrote:

> Greetings all,
>
> I am starting to look at VFD displays and am reading all I can about them.
>
> I am trying to get a better understanding of the pros and cons of using a 
> AC filament drive rather than an DC one.
>
> I am aware that on larger displays (like those monster ones from Russia) 
> it is necessary in order to create a more even glow across segments. I 
> wonder however how important this is for smaller segments like those in 
> IV-22 for example.
>
> Making the filament drive AC adds a small degree of complexity but if the 
> difference is visible and beneficial then I'd like to go that way.
>
> My project would be direct drive, no multiplexing required.
>
> Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>
> - Richard
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/4e3c4f47-eb29-4303-ab92-4159b1aef512n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to