Audio-amp idea is a very good suggestion; I have to save that for next time 
as the DCDC converter has been replaced and the old one was damaged during 
removal.

Problem has been fixed, and no false-triggering on the PIR sensor, even at 
higher sensitivity. I suspect an LC filter the input to the DCDC converter 
may have caused overvoltage over time. The filter was recommended by the 
manufacturer of the DCDC converter, but at the last minute I swapped to a 
different DCDC converter without changing/removing the LC filter. It worked 
fine for over 7 years, but damage was likely being done since Day 1.

On Friday, November 22, 2024 at 10:13:48 AM UTC-8 Leroy Jones wrote:

> You have a messed up power supply.   It is putting tons of noise on the 
> power bus.   Take a sensitive high impedance audio
> amplifier and connect it across Vcc and ground.   Listen.   It should be 
> very quiet if it's correct.   I bet yours has all sorts of hash in it.
> That hash will cause all sorts of weird circuit behavior.
>
> On Friday, November 22, 2024 at 12:58:46 PM UTC-5 gregebert wrote:
>
>> For the PIR sensor, the LDO regulator datasheet doesn't spec the minimum 
>> input voltage (Terrible, I say). I measured +3.3 out with my DMM, but that 
>> doesn't tell the whole story, so I would need to put a scope on it to be 
>> sure it's stable.
>>
>> For the RasPi, the datasheet says we can run down to 3.5V and still get 
>> 3.3V reliably. So that explains why I never had any crashes, etc.
>>
>> Later today I will get the supply fixed back to +5V and see what happens.
>>
>> On Friday, November 22, 2024 at 8:11:33 AM UTC-8 Instrument Resources of 
>> America wrote:
>>
>>> Having only a 1/2V of headroom is not good. I'm surprised that you're 
>>> getting your 3.3V. Anything else operating from that 5V supply could be 
>>> real iffy.
>>>
>>> Ira
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/21/2024 10:50 PM, gregebert wrote:
>>>
>>> So I checked my supply voltages, and that opened an unexpected can of 
>>> worms. The PIR sensor has it's own onboard linear regulator, and it's 
>>> pumping-out the expected 3.3VDC. The weird thing is the main 5V supply was 
>>> only putting out 3.8V. Despite that, the Raspberry Pi also had the correct 
>>> internal 3.3V supply (it also has it's own onboard supply). 
>>>
>>> So, the first mystery is why a DCDC converter rated for 1amp, and 
>>> typically supplying 400mA conked-out when it's not getting warm or 
>>> overloaded. I confirmed the RasPi typically uses around 200mA, and 
>>> occasionally peaks around 280mA.
>>>
>>> I have to dig further into the regulators on the RasPi and PIR sensor to 
>>> understand why they still produce 3.3V when their input is way-below 
>>> 5.0VDC. I'm glad that they do, but I want to confirm why.
>>>
>>> I'll see what I have laying around for replacing the 5V DCDC converter, 
>>> and if they beefier ones I have will fit on the PCB.
>>>
>>> Once I get this thing back together, I'll see if the PIR sensor is back 
>>> to normal. I have some replacement PIR sensors on the way.
>>>
>>> Why the DCDC converter failed is another mystery; I use these on all my 
>>> projects, and seeing one fail is disturbing, especially because many of my 
>>> gizmos dont have onboard A/D converters to monitor the power supplies.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, November 21, 2024 at 5:08:19 PM UTC-8 Max Di Noi wrote:
>>>
>>>> I had that problem once and it was due to a faulty capacitor on the 
>>>> high voltage power supply creating instability on the HV circuitry and 
>>>> affecting the PIR circuitry, which was odd as that itself had its own 
>>>> capacitors located close to the chip and the main power supply had plenty 
>>>> of stabilised power.  
>>>>
>>>> Now I'm trying to stabilise a microwave motion sensor that I designed 
>>>> based on one of those commercially available. It's embedded in the pcb, 
>>>> works OK but I need to figure out how to calibrate it more easily. It 
>>>> depends on temperature and material of the pcb. I purchased a frequency 
>>>> receiver up to 6gHz and I can see the signal on the screen. So that's a 
>>>> good start! Sorry, got sidetracked, slightly off topic :-) 
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>> From: newxito <[email protected]> 
>>>> Date: 21/11/2024 17:04 (GMT+00:00) 
>>>> To: neonixie-l <[email protected]> 
>>>> Subject: [neonixie-l] Re: PIR sensor got very sensitive 
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you have to clean the trimmer resistors or there is a little bug 
>>>> inside, I had that problem but it was with an outside PIR :-) 
>>>>
>>>> gregebert schrieb am Donnerstag, 21. November 2024 um 07:50:38 UTC+1:
>>>>
>>>>> Here's a strange story....a few weeks ago, I noticed my 7971 clock was 
>>>>> running a lot more than it was a few years ago. After some experimenting, 
>>>>> I 
>>>>> found out the PIR sensor is getting a lot of false triggers (no movement 
>>>>> in 
>>>>> room, even covering-up the sensor didn't keep it off). Turning-back the 
>>>>> sensitivity 1/4 turn did nothing, so I put it at minimum sensitivity and 
>>>>> it 
>>>>> seems to stop the false triggering. It still detects motion. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone else see this happen ? The sensor has been in-use for about 6 
>>>>> years; it's one of those cheap 5V units that cost about 1 USD and worked 
>>>>> fine for many years.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/f054d906-771b-4e73-9593-53c3e95e56f5n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/f054d906-771b-4e73-9593-53c3e95e56f5n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>
>>> To view this discussion, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/340ffb9a-b775-4a49-b1ae-0fde15e3ac6bn%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/340ffb9a-b775-4a49-b1ae-0fde15e3ac6bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/81f32efc-5f9f-4aa5-b35b-9f14f3f386c4n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to