End view tubes were designed with the intention of saving space at the
display face. For example in aircraft and tanks where the space available
for instruments and indicators is limited- there was more space behind the
tubes instead of above or below. New developments quickly surpassed the
refinements of   end view tubes and they were basically abandoned. An LED
display could be 10-15 times as dense as a nixie.

On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 11:33 AM Senk Ju <[email protected]> wrote:

> Currently, there are essentially only two companies producing new Nixie
> tubes at a reasonably high scale: Dalibor Farny and Millclock. Dalibor
> Farny offers just one type of tube, while Millclock produces two. I believe
> the primary reason for this is the difficulty in optimizing manufacturing
> processes to the point where the tubes can be sold at a price that people
> are willing to pay. In my experience, large side-viewing Nixie tubes tend
> to be more popular with most customers, making it economically sensible to
> concentrate production efforts on them. Just look at how much cheaper
> IN-12s are than IN-14s, for example, even though they are technically
> almost identical. Also, top viewing Nixie tubes basically require the pins
> to be embedded directly into the glass envelope. I think Dalibor Farny is
> currently working on a process to get reliable seals using this method but
> isn't quite there yet.
>
> HikariFaith <[email protected]> schrieb am So., 1. Dez. 2024, 18:15:
>
>> My initial thought had been that maybe it was too difficult to justify
>> the IN-12-type body with side-view nixie bodies being pretty much just
>> glass tubes with the other components inside of it, but that still didn't
>> quite explain why no one has even approached that yet. I would've thought
>> that once they had the easier form factor down they would've gone right to
>> the more difficult one that's similarly as popular. Maybe it has to do with
>> the IN-12 being more widely available?
>>
>> On Sunday, December 1, 2024 at 11:07:48 AM UTC-5 J Forbes wrote:
>>
>>> I'll answer the easy question first. The reason they don't make end view
>>> tubes is that it costs a lot of money and take  an incredible amount of
>>> work to make tubes. So, they need to make the most of the tubes they make,
>>> and this means being able to get the most money for them. So they have to
>>> be beautiful, large, expensive tubes. The character size in an end view
>>> tube is limited, vs that in a side view tube, so they only make side view
>>> tubes. It's what people will pay lots of money for.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, December 1, 2024 at 8:58:16 AM UTC-7 HikariFaith wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a few niche questions related to the making of nixie tubes I
>>>> can't seem to find definitive answers to anywhere. I have a feeling someone
>>>> here would be able to help me figure them out.
>>>>
>>>> 1. I understand that the cathodes need a certain amount of separation
>>>> to prevent arcing, but has anyone tried alternative methods of cathode
>>>> production in an effort to make that space smaller? The two that
>>>> immediately come to mind are sputtering tungsten coatings on an insulating
>>>> material and the inverse of that, which is coating the back of the tungsten
>>>> wire with an insulating material. I had also been wondering if it would be
>>>> possible to prevent arcing some other way.
>>>>
>>>> 2. When working borosilicate during the tube construction, how hot do
>>>> the components inside get? I'm thinking both in terms of components
>>>> directly touching the heated glass and those not touching (including
>>>> indirectly). I'm asking to figure out what thermal tolerances I should look
>>>> for in materials used to make a nixie tube.
>>>>
>>>> 3. How thick are the walls of a borosilicate nixie tube? Ideally, I'd
>>>> have as specific an answer as possible.
>>>>
>>>> 4. Why haven't new manufacturers of nixies made any top-view nixies
>>>> like the IN-12?
>>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "neonixie-l" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/dc70fcc9-f1df-4ad8-88a1-a35a79eef924n%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/dc70fcc9-f1df-4ad8-88a1-a35a79eef924n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "neonixie-l" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAPt9zv%3DkQOg1EKztZtqybxnQoYuwO6g3yD1CN_MxUz0A_vt49A%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAPt9zv%3DkQOg1EKztZtqybxnQoYuwO6g3yD1CN_MxUz0A_vt49A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAF5gi3Mb5dmZ%2B95s7GKuouHGkyVCvEGLCNmXtaRdjNquiHu_GQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to