Thanks for this info!  Just what I needed.

On Tuesday, August 5, 2025 at 7:37:28 PM UTC-4 Michail Wilson wrote:

> Hello,
>
>  
>
> Pin 13 and 14 are not used.  Most sockets (if not all) will have an open 
> area for the pins to slide in even if no connection is made.  For that 
> tube, you could literally simply cut them down (carefully) so you don’t 
> have to worry about it like in the circuit design you included a picture of 
> (pcbway?).
>
>  
>
> Very few tubes use those pins (like the B5971) so finding the sockets 
> loaded with all 14 holes is rare in itself.  When I spot them on ebay, I 
> snag them (for no real reason other than just knowing they’re rare).  I 
> love the auctions where people post pictures of tubes with sockets (14 pin 
> complete) and selling for the cost of a $5-$10 tube.   Those sockets are 
> worth more than the tube itself.
>
>  
>
> I believe the 5991 is pin compatible with the IN-12    (That is IN-12A.   
> The IN-12B uses pin 12 for the leading decimal point where the 5991 and 
> IN-12A don’t have it.
>
>  
>
> (So, unless you’re using a B5971, you don’t need sockets with pin 13/14 
> loaded with connecting gear)
>
>  
>
> M1
>
>  
>
> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> *On Behalf 
> Of *Tom Lang
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 3, 2025 9:45 AM
> *To:* neonixie-l <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [neonixie-l] Re: Newcomer From Asheville, NC 5991 vs IN-12
>
>  
>
> Some insight as I was thinking about this.  I looked at some pcb sockets.  
> Apparently pins 13 and 14 are not carried thru the actual socket itself.  
> This would imply that as long as the tubes were not directly soldered onto 
> the pcb board itself (I would expect no one to do this) a board for the 
> IN-12 could accommodate a 5991 after all??
>
> On Sunday, August 3, 2025 at 12:35:37 PM UTC-4 Tom Lang wrote:
>
> I'm a retired electrical engineer familiar with designing and building 
> vacuum tube amplifiers.  This is my first foray into the nixie tube clock 
> world.
>
>  
>
> I want to use the Burroughs 5991 tube on some pcb boards designed for the 
> IN-12 tube.  I have looked and looked but cannot find definitive answers as 
> to physical interchangeability of the two especially on prefabricated pcb 
> boards designed for the IN-12.  At this time I do not have any of the tubes 
> or boards on hand.
>
>  
>
> It appears (see attachments) that the 5991 has two extra pins 13 & 14 that 
> would have to be accommodated if one were to utilize a 5991 on a board for 
> the IN-12.  However, the picture of the "tube adapters" implies otherwise 
> (where's the holes for 13 and 14?).  Also it DOES appear that chassis mount 
> sockets (such as the brown ones shown) do have relief holes for the extra 
> 5991 pins.
>
>  
>
> There are attractive prices for premade boards for the IN-12 tubes that I 
> probably would purchase if they are compatible with the 5991.  However, I 
> don't mind having to use chassis mounted sockets and flying leads if 
> necessary for the 5991.
>
>  
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "neonixie-l" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/f5f96fac-3906-4457-996d-54749fd39815n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/f5f96fac-3906-4457-996d-54749fd39815n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/5dd93c0a-4aef-420f-a0a1-dcf02c79952dn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to