Have you contacted Rogers circuit boards, and described the 'issue/s' that you are having, to see if they might have a solution?

Ira



On 9/29/2025 9:07 PM, Sadudu wrote:

Thank you all for your attention. I’d like to address some questions here:

1.

    *Why not directly use mica sheets, but instead try to find another
    structure?*
    In the original B7971, a large amount of mica sheets were used as
    structural components, mainly to insulate and support the
    electrodes. In other Nixie tubes, it has also been proven that
    mica has extremely low outgassing and outstanding stability, which
    is why it has been widely used in vacuum tubes. So, mica is indeed
    a very ideal material.

Then why did I try to look for other materials? Due to the special structure of the B7971, each cathode is not directly connected to the base but instead uses some adapter wires. From the disassembled B7971, it can be seen that it did not use spot welding for hard connections. Instead, the B7971 used a kind of spring-clip-like structure that fastened the cathode and the adapter wire together. This design is very ingenious, as it made use of the elasticity of mica—you can refer to this article for details.

https://www.tube-tester.com/sites/nixie/data/b-7971/b7971.htm

This approach requires a rather precise assembly process. The mica sheets need to be riveted with a metal baseplate, and suitable-sized connectors must be made for the backside. As a result, the process is very complicated.

If Rogers circuit boards had worked, they could have directly replaced the combined role of mica sheets + baseplate + connectors. Furthermore, I would have been able to use spot welding to achieve hard connections between the adapter wires and the cathodes. This was the main reason I sought out alternative materials—to simplify the internal structure and improve the yield rate of the product.

2.

    *Next plan*
    I am very grateful to some friends who sent me emails suggesting
    other possible materials. Our next plan is to try using
    ceramic-based PCBs for this purpose. Although it may also fail, I
    believe it is much better than Rogers high-frequency boards.
    Ceramic has also been widely used as an insulating material in
    vacuum tubes, but I need to figure out how the copper layer is
    bonded to the ceramic substrate. If it is applied through a
    plating process, then it probably won’t be a big problem. However,
    if some kind of adhesive is used to bond the copper foil to the
    substrate, then this material cannot be used in a vacuum tube.

If this plan doesn’t work, then we will move forward with reproducing the original B7971 structure for production.

Finally, thank you again for your attention.

On Monday, September 29, 2025 at 11:45:52 PM UTC+8 J Forbes wrote:

    you made me look.

    mica.jpg

    On Monday, September 29, 2025 at 7:56:08 AM UTC-7 Neil QQ wrote:

        In my former career job (rf engineer) Rogers material was used
        for primarily for prototyping because it's dielectric constant
        is uniform and tightly controlled and because it can be easily
        "machined" with common lab tools.  For consumer goods, though,
        it is too expensive.  Once the circuit was proven, fired
        alumina substrate was used.  In quantity, alumina is much
        cheaper, ridged, and has excellent electrical and mechanical
        temperature stability.  There are a number of custom and
        prototype alumina vendors.  Here's one of the biggest:
        https://ceramic-pcb.com.

        As others mentioned, mica is still widely available. I've used
        it too for certain high voltage, low volume applications. 
        It's brittleness can be troublesome in high vibration/shock
        applications.  Environmental considerations over the last few
        decades have driven mica prices higher.





        On Sunday, September 28, 2025 at 1:35:59 PM UTC-5 Mac Doktor
        wrote:


            On Sep 27, 2025, at 12:01 PM, dudu sa <[email protected]>
            wrote:

             About half a year ago, a few friends came to me and
            asked if I could make a Nixie tube similar to the B7971.
            As one of the few Nixie tube manufacturers, I thought
            about it for a while and decided to give it a try.

            I forwarded this to Eric Barbour, the administrator of the
            Tube Collector's Association list. The fact that he isn't
            ripping you to shreds is a sign that he thinks this has
            possibilities and that you're not an idiot for trying.
            He's impressed with the repros that have been made so far.


            On Sep 27, 2025, at 10:28 PM, metasonix wrote:

            Well....I could have told him (for free) this wouldn't
            work. Only materials that can be heated and outgassed
            FULLY can be put inside a high-vacuum or gas tube.

            This is apparently the stuff he tried to use. It has
            great dielectric characteristics, but there is nothing
            about using it in a vacuum.

            
https://rogerscorp.com/advanced-electronics-solutions/ro4000-series-laminates

            Maybe talk to a company that makes thin film hybrid
            circuits. They can probably make a degassable board out
            of alumina with traces that can be spot-welded, since
            they have been making such things for 60+ years. It will
            NOT be a bargain. Feel free to repost this to the group.

            https://www.thinfilm.com/substrates.html

            
https://www.coorstek.com/en/industries/electronics/microelectronics/thin-film-electronic-substrates/

            All modern electronic components are made with some kind
            of plastics, epoxies, or phenolics or whatever. None of
            which can be processed in a tube. Even Teflon will
            eventually disintegrate into hydrogen fluoride and other
            things.

            If they manage to build a working B7971, they are well
            within their rights to charge a very stiff price, at
            least $500 retail and probably more. Making such things
            in the 1950s was easier because mica was cheaper, one
            could buy parts and envelopes from third parties, and you
            could pay bored housewives 50c/hour to assemble the damn
            things.

            That price may seem slightly high but Eric knows all about
            actually recouping an investment and earning a living. As
            well as dealing with customers who can't figure out how to
            use his products.


            Terry Bowman, KA4HJH
            "The Mac Doctor"

            "Tape machines ought to be big and cumbersome and
            difficult to use, if only to keep the riff-raff
            out."—Steve Albini, 1993

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/9522453b-6d55-4e1a-b5df-46e2b3fd3ca7n%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/9522453b-6d55-4e1a-b5df-46e2b3fd3ca7n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/21d3494d-f6ec-410e-ba69-2b117b09869c%40HUGHES.NET.

Reply via email to